Monetary Policy Statement 6 August 2020

 

Some Healthy Deviation and Unfulfilled Expectations

The twin objectives of Monetary Policy – Containing Inflation and Promoting Growth – have largely been addressed in the latest Monetary Policy Statement of the Governor released on the 6^th August, 2020. Economy continues to face unprecedented stress in the backdrop of unabated pandemic. Inflation of 6.1% is +2% over the inflation target of RBI.

RBI says that inflation objective is further obscured by (a) the spike in food prices because of flood ravage in the north and north-east and ongoing lock down related disruptions; and (b) cost-push pressures in the form of high taxes on petroleum products, hikes in telecom charges, rising raw material costs. These factors led the Monetary Policy Committee to hold to the existing policy rates undisturbed.

Fitch and other rating institutions say that global growth tumbles in the face of pandemic growing uncertainty. ‘All manufacturing sectors remained in the negative territory excepting pharmaceutical sector. Manufacturing PMI remained in contraction at 34.2. Rural demand increase is the only silver line in the economy. Services sector indices show modest resumption of the economy. Yet tourism and aviation, passenger traffic in trains and buses do not show any signs of recovery. There is broad realization that monetary policy should drive credit in sectors that need most and the Banking sector requires more attention.

Liquidity pumped into the banking sector is of the order of Rs.9.57trillion or 4.7% of GDP with no show of risk appetite among banks. This has only assured the Depositors that the money is safe with banks and there is no need for hurried withdrawals for consumption needs.

CREDIT POLICY

The main driver of the consumption, credit activity of banks is mooted. Lot has been expected from the RBI on the credit policy front. Let me first deal with the best things first: Priority sector lending guidelines have been revised reducing regional disparities in the flow of credit and broadening the scope of priority sector to include credit to the Start-ups in the areas of renewable energy, including solar power and biogas compression plants; and, increasing the targets for lending to ‘small and marginal farmers and weaker sections.’ Incentives for lending to these sectors is related to credit flow to the lagging districts and assigning lower weight to incremental credit to priority sectors in districts where comparatively higher flow of credit had already taken place.

MSME Sector:

RBI Bulletin July 2020 indicates that during the current financial year so far, year-on-year growth is -7.6% for manufacturing MSEs and -5.4% for medium enterprises.

MSME Pulse Report indicates covid vulnerability high among 63 percent of the MSMs. Only 31 percent are strongly positioned to come back. It is these that will be pepped up by Banks and not the vulnerable even if they are standard assets. The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic will impact the profitability of MSMEs due to the declining market demand and rising operating costs in the new way of working.

Number of Studies, notably, ITC, Skoch Foundation, RGICS, CII, FICCI etc reveal that 59-74 percent of the MSMEs are highly risky and would be on the brink of closure if cash inflows do not support them upfront. GoI took the stand that they will be supported by Credit while those that are weak will be supported by sub-ordinated debt or Equity. This Equity product is yet to roll out from the government although Rs,20000cr guarantee backed fund is allocated in the package.

The Policy nowhere referred to the credit-driven Covid-19 Atma Nirbhar Abhiyan packages. Package one related to the standard assets at 20% additional working capital under Automatic Emergency Credit Relief Guarantee from National Credit Guarantee Trust. Against the Rs.3trn target under this window for standard asset ( Units that are performing or continuing their manufacturing activity) to be achieved by the end of September 2020, Banks have so far sanctioned around Rs.1.6trn of which 60% is disbursed. There are field reports that Banks are seeking to extend the existing collateral and/or guarantee to the additional working capital. The disadvantage for the borrowers is on two counts: one fresh documentation involving stamp duty of Rs.1000 and 2) their existing collateral will get extended for the additional working capital and this is quite contrary to the intentions of the scheme.

The second scheme, involving stressed assets under the category of Special Mention Accounts-2. The broad guidelines released are:

¡  Account shall be -

Ø  Standard as on 31.03.2018

Ø  In regular operations during 2018-19/2019-20

Ø  SMA2 later or NPA as on 30.04.2020 , and;

¡  Commercially viable enterprises post revival

¡  7-yr moratorium for principal amount of subordinated debt/equity

¡  Interest payable every month

¡  Subordinated Debt amount up to 15% of Debt O/s or Rs.75 lakh, whichever is lower will be given as personal loan to the promoter for a 10-year tenure. This amount should not be used for recovery of NPA. Entrepreneur can use this to meet his cash deficit, for meeting the payments to labour and making the unit covid-19 compliant.

¡  Unit should revive in 5 years –RBI Guidelines of March 17, 2016.

¡  Unit should be on growth path for 10 years

¡  Scheme Valid till 30^th September 2020.

Banks have not rolled out this package so far. RBI Master Circular of 2016 on Revival and Restructuring (RBI/16-17/338 dated March 17, 2016) stipulates: 1. Corrective Action Plan; 2. Revival and Restructuring of all viable manufacturing enterprises and 3. Recovery of the unviable through legal means. Banks have not implemented most of these instructions, save rare exceptions. Under the Subordinate Debt scheme, the enterprise should be first viable; it should be currently running whatever be the capacity utilization, and then, it should be restructured to see it as a standard asset in a year’s time and additional revival package and sovereign obligations if any to be recovered fully before the five year period concludes. Initial moratorium for the revival package would depend upon the viability arrived at. District Committees had to be formed and they should decide on the viability.

For all such units with outstanding liability of Rs.10lakhs and below, the Branch Manager is the deciding authority for reviving the unit while for the units over and above this limit, appropriate authority as decided by the Bank will take the call and place it before the District Committee. Though several Banks committed to the RBI that all such District Committees were set up even by December 2017, most of them are dysfunctional.

Under these circumstances, RBI announcing MSME revival and restructuring of enterprises falling under the category of GST-registered Standard Assets as on 1.3.2020 before 31^st March 2021 looks ambivalent.

The virtuous thing about the current instruction is that the asset classification as standard may be retained as such, whereas the accounts that may have slipped into NPA category between March2, 2020 and date of implementation may be upgraded as ‘Standard asset’ from such date of implementation. Banks are expected to maintain additional provisioning of 5% over and above the provision already held by them for such assets.

RBI should have allowed such forbearance for all the assets revived under the Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan -2 (Equity-driven revival). While Banks are aware that such any additional loan consequent to revision will be treated as standard asset, their reluctance to revive the viable enterprises is absolute risk aversion.

The only saving grace is that sale of securities to the ARC will now attract higher provisioning. This should trigger the thought that by reviving the asset instead of sale to ARC they would gain in provisioning as the asset is likely to be standard asset at the end of one year of revival. 

Monetary Policy viewed from the MSME perspective, is like what GoI proposes, RBI disposes. Apathy towards MSMEs still continues.  It is suggested that the RBI and GoI be on the same page in so far as MSME revival is concerned and second, shorten the period of decision making to just two weeks as against 55 days’ process indicated in the Master Circular of 2016 referred above.

Government of Telangana seems to be taking the lead in the revival of MSMEs. Telangana Industrial Health Clinic Ltd., set up by it, has put on its website, the Learning Tool for Revival and a Revival Pre-pack online for the enterprises to log in and post the details for quickly deciding on the prospects of viability.

Retail Loans:

As regards personal loans, RBI recognising that these loans falling under Retail Loan portfolio will be the next NPA balloon that will blow off, has accommodated the Banks through a resolution plan. It has been the practice of several Banks both in the Public and Private sector as also a few NBFCs to grant the personal loans wherever the related corporate accounts are held by them. Because of slow growth and the pandemic, several have lost their jobs and personal loan segment has come under severe pressure. RBI left it to the wisdom of Banks concerned to invoke the resolution plan by December 31, 2020 and shall be implemented within 90 days thereafter. There will be no requirement of third party validation or Expert Committee, or by credit rating agencies. Board Approved Policy will be necessary, and the resolution plan shall not exceed two years. Banks will have big relief on this score.

This Monetary Policy recognized the economic environment as tough to recover in the immediate short term. At the same time, it failed to provide the real growth impulses in invigorating the MSMEs to the required degree and failed to generate the risk appetite among banks. It looks more worried about the capital of banks than credit to the required sectors at the required speed.

The views are personal. This is an invited article from Skoch Foundation.

 

 

 

Little Cheer for Bank Nationalization

INDIA NEEDS TO DO SOMETHING MORE…

CRISIS OR NO CRISIS

                                                                                   

The Day of Bank Nationalization in India passed off on Sunday. Smiles were kept years behind. None talk of village adoption scheme; no Chairman would go to a village these days to see how their rural branches are helping the farmers or the MSME is financed. No pride in ownership. No regret for bad governance.

But for a full page pull-out by the All India Bank Employees’ Association on the 20^th July, 2020, who remembers the Nationalization Day? Neither the employees, nor the disappointed customers that include even the Banks’ own pensioners, nor those seeking credit from them recall the Day. People are only alert on wearing masks and spiriting their palms before handling the currency received from outsiders. Everyone cries wolf on the ever-bulging non-performing assets. The only solid reform that we boast of is the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Job creation is hurt badly in the organized sector with near-65% of MSMEs shutting their windows in pandemic. Their markets are yet to revive.

Banks in UK, Iceland, and even the US resorted to the most criticized and least preferred route of nationalization of banks, when they confronted a crisis. The then OBAMA initiative that received positive response of stock markets since the announcement of Toxic Loan basket takeover under a joint Government-Private Fund, was however inadequate to retrofit the lost confidence in the financial system. 

The revival of ‘protectionist’ actions would seem to be asserting more in finance than in trade.  While the regulators of G-20 would be meeting at the shortly, global regulatory regime has serious limitations and they should be realigned with domestic regulations that have compulsive cultural characteristics. 

Events so far have proved beyond doubt that a global regulatory regime would not be able to provide appropriate solutions to the type of recession that had set in due to pandemic. No prediction as to when it would end. Annual Balance Sheets for 2020 are waiting for finalization in several institutions. Basel III may have introduced a modicum of discipline and uniformity in risk discipline among Banks globally. Several regulators sought more flexibility. It is important for India to realize its distinction in the emerging economic scenario and how necessary it is to turn the head on the screws.

At the commencement of Covid attack, India did well and even till now, we do not find people scrambling for food because farmer and rural India stood by the nation.  The biggest blunder of the system is more announcements than actions and imperfect monitoring and undependable statistics. All the rating agencies, IMF and World Bank kept the ratings low and estimated growth of 42% in 2021. Opening the economy with lot of courage has not been taken too kindly by Corona that has been surging every day crossing the 10lakh persons. India took the 4th rank in the world in Corona affected nations.

Second, we have the key sectors like Steel, Zinc, other Metals and Coal as also the transportation system largely in the public sector. We entered the Commodity markets and derivative markets in our anxiety to mix with the globe. WTO is almost nearing collapse with most countries choosing to adopt policies that secure their own nations and people, not caring so much for the global discipline. 

Third, there was no demand recession of the magnitude that the other countries in the globe faced.  Still the rural areas where still 65 percent of our population lives, drive the demand growth.  Having said that some facts that can be hardly ignored: there is a steep decline in job growth; steep declines have also set in the private sector trumped up by the global recession; the urban and metro retail chains took a severe beating; the real estate and housing boom that irrationally stepped up land values across the country took the first heat-stroke and with them, the dependent MSME sector that is seen as the engine of growth.

Fourth, Banks that lent heavily for the retail sector and real estate sector started facing the continuous decline in their performing assets.  They lost confidence in the resurgence of the demand and the productive capacities of the manufacturing sector.  Most public sector banks even, refused to go with the RBI to pump credit. 

Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan, the stimuli announced to combat Covid-19, injecting more than Rs.20lakh liquidity, still face risk aversion from the Banks. This high liquidity released only moved to the investments in treasury instruments and to quote Subba Rao, former Governor, gave confidence to depositors in the Banking system that their monies are safe with the Banks, notwithstanding PMC Bank resolution still waiting at the doors of the RBI. It has two windows: one, investments and the other credit. The latest report on Investments not withstanding the $10mn investment announced by Google, all the investment projects are reported to be lagging behind and the cost over-run of the projects already swallowed the entire incentive package.

MSMEs are yet to come out of the two shocks of demonetization and GST. After the redefinition, and after a host of digital platforms placed within their reach, the access to credit by all counts is a poor show. Out of the National Credit Guarantee Trust linked credit incentive to the standard assets, Banks disbursed only 50% or less. This was supposed to be automatic release of 20% additional working capital. The second window to the stressed assets through Sub-ordinated debt is yet to open as the operating instructions were received only a few weeks back.

SIZE – AN IRRATIONAL CONCERN

Merger of PSBs taken up while the economy was slowing down is yet to show up the results. The market value of the SBI post-merger is way behind its peer, HDFC in the private sector. Sanctioning Rs.1200cr to a known defaulter in its books and erstwhile chronic NPA resolving through IBC, does not hold SBI in any high esteem either among global peers or its own clients. Government of India, by merging PSBs to 10 from 28 did not gain either in image or confidence of the people. Several clients say that corruption has become endemic in PSBs and not even acknowledging a complaint, or a letter of customer is so habitual that the latter are in the lurch.

While the Government’s efforts to digitize the delivery system have borne fruits reasonably going by the way the MNREG wages and other direct benefits reached the intended groups during the last two years, financial inclusion is way behind. The reach of banks to the poor has declined.

Regulator’s job is to make sure that the vertical and horizontal growth of institutions should not be allowed to go with a feeling that because of their size they are insulated from collapse and that the Government and regulator had to do something to keep them afloat even in the worst event like bankruptcy.  This is where the RBI should reformulate its views and ensure that the organizational structures irrespective of their affiliations do not overboard the governance and do not oversize.

The silos-based regulatory system currently in vogue, with the RBI regulating Banks and NBFCs, Stock Markets by the SEBI, Pensions by the Pension Fund Regulatory Development Authority, Insurance by the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority, and Commodity Futures by the Futures Market Commission should be effectively brought under Financial Services Regulatory Authority. Department of Financial Services, Union Ministry of Finance may have persons of eminence but when it comes to examining micro issues for macro management, it left lot to deliver. Collective wisdom needs to emerge to improve financial regulation and governance that affects 130bn people does not brook delay.  

India, for example does not have credit risk insurance of the order prevailing in either Italy, or Germany or South Africa.  The Credit Guarantee Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises is but a poor cousin of the trade and credit risk. Credit Risk could not be introduced in India as the IRDA was apprehensive of the consequences of credit default.  It is perhaps of the opinion that the moral turpitude would reach new dimensions if credit risk is introduced. 

Percy Mistry Committee called for a unified regulatory architecture for resolving issues dealing with segmentation of financial markets into banking, capital markets, insurance, pensions, derivatives etc. Sweden, Singapore, UAE, UK, Republic of Korea to cite a few have already moved into the unified regulatory system.

OPERATIONAL ISSSUES:

Warren Buffet, the most reputed investor, is quoted at number of places: “Derivatives were financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal.” Over-the-counter derivatives that are off-balance sheet instruments come to surface suddenly when their collaterals fall and when their values become riskier to hold, killing in one stroke rest of the healthy assets of the Banks. The delivery and recipient systems have not reached a level of maturity to play with them, even a decade after their active entry.  Indian financial system cannot afford the consequences of systemic risks arising from their instrumentality.

Let me go to the most familiar area – Credit Risk that is mostly understood as risk of default.  Here the risks arising from asymmetric information have not been dealt with. The Credit Information Bureau India Ltd.,(CIBIL) is the only institution that currently unfolds client’s historic information at  price.  Entry of multiple players with the enactment of Credit Information Services Act of 2005 is put on hold.  Trade and Credit information services should enter the competitive domain for the information system to get into a semblance of order.

Credit rating agencies in India that are approved by the RBI are none other than the Fitch, Standard and Poor, Moodys etc., whose ratings busted on the threshold of sub-prime crisis and beyond.  There is no proof that they are doing their job differently.  Until the rating agencies’ services are paid for by the financing institutions that make use of the ratings and hold them accountable for the ratings, there is no guarantee that the ratings per se would add to the quality of the credit portfolio the banks carry in respect of the rated assets. 

While the Government and the RBI, Insurance and Capital Market regulatory authorities have proved one-upmanship over the other regulatory authorities in reasonably insulating the Indian Financial System from the impacts of the current global crisis, a large gap remains in what is needed to be done. The time to put things in the right shape is now and right away.

It is high time to appoint a High-level Committee that should also include outside experts to clean up the banking system with an open mind.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*The Author is an Economist with three decades of banking experience and a Risk Management Specialist He can be reached at yerramr@gmail.com The views are author’s own.

https://www.moneylife.in/article/ramping-up-the-banks-india-needs-to-do-something-more-crisis-or-no-crisis/60966.html

Banking reforms the Budget should not miss

Banking Reforms the Budget should not miss

Former President of India, Pratibha Patil, in her address to the Lok Sabha on 4^th June 2009 said: “Our immediate priorities and programmes must be to focus on the management of the economy that will counter the effect of global (domestic) slowdown by a combination of sectoral and macrolevel policies.” She laid emphasis on accelerating growth that is ‘socially and regionally more inclusive’. 

The objective of overall policy in India is accelerated inclusive growth with macroeconomic stability. This approach is likely to reverberate in the ensuing Budget Session.

FM needs to give a measured response to the imperative outlined. In order to take the States on board, she may announce clearance of all the dues on GST to the States once the present audit of GST concludes. She may also like to give a new financial sector reform agenda to resolve the existing imbroglio. A few of the available options will be the focus of this article.

FM is at crosshairs between fiscal austerity and enhancing public spending to stimulate growth. Discomfort lies in the worst performance of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) and failure of NBFCs. While the RBI is balancing inflation and growth objectives, the recently released Financial Stability Report re-emphasis on the need for ‘good governance across board’, improving the performance of PSBs and the necessity to build buffers against their disproportionate operational risk losses.

None of the recent bank mergers added to her comfort. Hence there is need to look at the unfinished earlier reform agenda suggested by various Committees since 1991 and announce either a Reform Agenda or appointment of a High-Level Committee with a specific timeframe for actionable agenda that could stonewall criticism against the PSB failures, bank frauds and twin balance sheet problems. 

The issues surrounding banking are not peripheral.

The moral hazard consequence of banks receiving bailout is worrisome now and therefore, she may refrain from any further bailout announcement. Stress in the NBFCs and Cooperative banking seemed to have forced re-look at the Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance Bill, 2017. While the Bill proposes to establish a Resolution Corporation to monitor the health of the financial providers on an ongoing basis, the bail-in by depositors and stakeholders is worrisome.

Increasing stress in various buckets of assets stands unabated and calls for a surgical strike. Banks’ credit origination risks need urgent evaluation. It is important to relook at the universal banking model the country adopted aping the west. Customer preferences and customer rights have taken a back seat.

Market-led reforms of the past have replaced social banking with profit-banking objective. 2025 $5trn GDP target should look at more efficient performance of banking as key to its achievement. There is a need for reconciling satisfactorily the dilemma of policies appropriate for short term with those suitable for the long term.

Governor, RBI in a recent address indicated that he would like to look at the priority sector categorization afresh to ensure that it delivers the intended. This assumes greater importance in financial inclusion agenda as efforts hitherto like Jandhan, Mudra etc could make only numerical and not qualitative advances. Provision of adequate and timely credit to the rural areas in general and agriculture, micro and small enterprises and weaker and vulnerable sectors, remained a major challenge for Indian banks for decades.

Direct credit programmes in Korea, Japan in 1950s and 1980s revealed the need for narrowly focused and nuanced programmes with sunset clauses delivered the results. The problem with directed credit is essentially three-fold: First, pricing at its true market level, second, avoidance of the persons who are not credit-constrained, and third, selection of focused areas and regions without political interference in undefined democracy.

Credit discipline and equity, the twin principles of credit dispensation suffered a systemic failure with politically motivated loan write-offs in several States. Both farm and micro and small enterprises require credit with extension, handholding, monitoring and supervision as key deliverable. This calls for out-of-the-box thinking.

While there has been broad recognition that increasing supply to cope with the rising demand through diversified lending institutions like small finance banks, and NBFCs of various hues, ever-increasing demand to cope with new technologies, low labour productivity, and absence of aggregators structurally to resolve the pricing of produce at the farmer’s doorstep, are all issues that require comprehensive solutions. Resources should not fall short of the requirement for such effort. Budget 2020-21 should make a bold and strategic announcement regarding the direction of investments in farm sector supportive for responsible credit flow. FM would do well to avoid announcing any crop loan targets and leave it to the RBI’s priority sector reformulation.

Supply-side issues cannot be adequately and appropriately addressed without institutional reforms focusing restructuring NABARD and giving a new mandate consistent with the future goals of the economy. SIDBI the second surviving DFI is living on interest arbitrage and enjoying the munificence of the Finance Ministry to the detriment of the sector it was intended to protect and promote. This also begs either closure or restructuring.

As regards governance of banks, the unattended reforms of Narasimham Committee -II deserve attention: Removing 10% voting rights; reducing the legally required public shareholding in PSBs from 51 to 33 percent; improving the Boards qualitatively with well-defined independent and functional directors’ roles.

Since the FM already announced that she is exploring the amendment to the Cooperative Act to skip the duality of regulation of cooperative banks by both the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and RBI, she would be going one step further in eliminating similar duality between her Department of Banking and RBI in so far as the PSBs are concerned, particularly because the RBI created separate Departments of Supervision and Regulation and College of Supervisors to improve the supervisory skills of RBI personnel.

the Hindu Business Line, 16.1.2020 https://t.co/eNEANVcaW8?amp=1

Crisis in PSBs - II: Ethics Must Be Made Integral to Governance

Crisis in PSBs - II: Ethics Must Be Made Integral to Governance

Moneylife Digital Team

30.7.2019

If we want to improve the governance process, we have to make ethics at the centre. Ethics and values should be the basis on which all corporates and more particularly, banks dealing with public resources shall function, as trustees. It is the attitude to life and the value system one has to cherish and live with.

Values are universal in character whereas their application changes. Business executives apply various ethical tests as a guide. There is variation among them on what test they apply on different occasions.  These tests, developed by Fr K Cyric include:

Corporate Executive Ethics Tests[i]

Ethics Test	Focus Question by the Executive
Relevant Information Test	“Have I obtained as much information as possible to make a decision?”
Involvement Test	“Have I involved all who have a right to have input?”
Test of Common Sense	“Does the action I am getting ready to take really make sense?”
Consequential Test	Have I anticipated and attempted to accommodate the consequences of this decision on any, who are affected by it?”
Mirror Test	“What does the man in the glass really say?”
Conventionalist Ethics Test	“Does this fall within the legal framework?”
Hedonistic Ethics Test	“Does it feel good to make such decision?”
Intuition Ethics Test	“Does my gut feeling approve of this decision?”
Revelation Ethics Test	“Does the decision cause greatest good for greatest number?”
Professional Ethics Test	“Will the decision be approved by the professional peers?”
Organizational Ethics Test	“Is the decision consistent with organizational goals?”
Test on one’s best self	“Is this action or decision I am getting ready to make, compatible with my concept of myself at my best?”
Fairness Test	“Would I consider this decision fair from the point of view of stakeholders?”
Enduring Values Test	“Does this decision uphold the enduring values?”
Universality Test	“Would I apply this decision to all similar situations, even to myself?”
Test of making public	“How do I feel if others knew I was doing this?”
Test of ventilation	“How would others view my decision?”
Test of Purified ideas	“Am I thinking that the decision I am making is right because some authority says, it is right?”

---

[i] R. Durgadoss & B. Yerram Raju (2011), ‘A Saint in the Board Room’, Konark Publishers (P) Ltd., New Delhi

Ethical Decisions Vary with Executive Profiles

A survey conducted in 1992 in Malaysia on 252 executives from different countries revealed that there were differences in ethical decisions, which varied with job position, job specialization, ethnic group, age and salary. There were differences in attitude between the USA and Hong Kong personnel. 77% of USA personnel said that they would report a defective or unsafe product, compared to 50% of Hong Kong respondents.

Three women, Sherron Watkins (ENRON), Coleen Rowley (FBI agent on clues to September 11) and Cynthia Cooper (World Com), all whistle blowers were named as the persons of the year 2002 by Time magazine.

Cuoto, an employee of Bayer Corporation who knew how Bayer was making wrong claims on the USA government, fought a hard battle to have his testimony recorded and videotaped in August 2002, even though he was struggling with terminal illness. Bayer pleaded guilty and paid fines under False Claim Act.

Such a strong level of conviction and whistle blowing attitude is not prevalent in many countries, where people do not come forward, even when they see wrong-doing happening in front of their eyes; thus, the behavior of executives differ from region to region. Moneylife in India has been acting as a whistle blower in many breaches to the legitimate claims of various stakeholders of the banks and FIs. Much ahead of the unfolding of the IL&FS collapse, it has warned that this monolithic institution has made many compromises of the rules and regulations of SEBI and RBI, though it took quite some time for the regulators to take note of them.  It is therefore important that each bank board should approve a Whistle Blower Policy and prominently display it on its website.

Facing Ethical Dilemmas

In business, not only are executives faced with questions between right and wrong, but also between right and right. We have experienced situations in which the professional responsibilities unexpectedly come into conflict with deepest values. Executives are caught in a conflict between right and right. And no matter which option they choose, they feel like they have come up short.

Research on moral standards and business ethics is sparse. Martin Weber in 1998 found that 85.9% of managers claim drawing their moral standards at work from the expectations perceived in the work environment. Organizational norms embodied by the corporation’s culture are strong determinants of individual thought and behavior in the workplace, whereas corporate culture establishes and maintains norms.

When employees have no clear picture of the moral or ethical stance of the organization, they tend to operate at the lowest perceived level. Going by the increasing frauds, the alleged corruption in banks at various levels where they interface with the customers on loans and the way persons in top positions compromised the principles and statutes leads us to conclude that the ethics committees of bank boards, even where they are in place, have not functioned effectively.

A quote from a Raghuram, Rajan’s speech of May 2014, would be an apt conclusion of this paper: ‘The banking sector is on the cusp of revolutionary change. . .  Let us remember that what is at stake is not just the tremendous amount of national value that is represented by public sector banks but future financing and investment in our economy. A healthy public sector banking system should be distant from government influence but not from public purpose.’ https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_SpeechesView.aspx?Id=893

  

11 Point Plan for the Union Budget 2018

An 11-Point Agenda for the Union Budget

Dr B Yerram Raju

18 January 2018  

Weighed down by internal pressures from the party to present a Budget that gets accolades from a large voter constituency in the face of General Elections 2019, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley,  has a few ready options to pep up the economy.

1. Go all out to clear the misgivings on the Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance (FRDI) Bill by incorporating oral assurances given in the Parliament into the proposed Bill.

2. Announce a winding up plan for the sinking PSBs instead of piling them on to those that are working efficiently.

3. Insist on all the banks to stick to banking work instead of selling third party products that carry hefty commissions as these products are invariably dumping unknown and unannounced risks on the unsuspecting users. Restart development banks to finance Infrastructure. Turn banks into growth engines.

4. Announce withdrawal of government funded programmes that failed to take off or made only a symbolic entry. Over 110 schemes launched for the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) failed to reach even 0.5% of the eligible enterprises. These resources can be earmarked to finance those schemes that showed performance. 

5. Re-engineer financial incentives to go online only with appropriate safeguards also announced. Fiscal incentives have more transparency than financial incentives. 

6. Scrap all the cess hat have no specific account of expenditure earmarked for them.

7. Appoint a committee to amend the treasury code with its rules formulated during the British Raj. This is the root cause of corruption and delays in the release of funds for government expenditure. 

8. Announce the date for incorporating the related Rules whenever the Parliament passes a particular Bill, so as to remove ambiguity and ensure compliance. Every Act must have priority do-ables for all the stakeholders as an Abstract. 

9. Introduce a modicum of agricultural tax, with a threshold of income over Rs25 lakh per annum. All the small and marginal farmers, as well as tenant farmers will be exempt as they would have not earned this much even for a five year period. The rate for them can be 10% over the Rs25 lakhs. Multiple slabs need not exist for them.

10. Manufacturing start ups should be tax exempt for five years or till their turnover crosses Rs2 crore.

11. All corporations spending a minimum of 5% on research and development or incubation centres recognised by the governments shall be exempt for such spend, treating it as Investment.

The FM would do well to make specific allocations for agriculture, education and social services that make good sense not just from the viewpoint of electoral benefits but as overall economic benefits. It is obvious that the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003 (FRBM) will be thrown overboard but for some jugglery with numbers. There are a few states like Telangana, AP and Karnataka that have introduced agricultural budgets. It will be necessary for the Union government to go in sync with the states in its ideal of cooperative federalism to ensure the outcomes.  

(The author is Adviser, Telangana Industrial Health Clinic, Government of Telangana. Views in this article are personal.) 

  

 www.moneylife.in/18.1.18

Fragility to Fast Track?

Arun Jailtley mentioned that the UPA’s fragile economy is on fast track now. CSO forecast of GDP growth on the eve of the Budget 2018-19, however, is 6.5%, the slowest of the last four years. What has moved fast?

Union Budget presentation moved from March end to February end. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code completed its first anniversary. But the MSMEs are yet to get their deal. All the goods carriers from North East to down South Kerala move without any check post hurdles and the palm greasing saving nearly Rs.30000cr for various companies. Indirect Tax Reforms through GST with all its initial hiccups is still with glitches. Tax compliance moved an inch up on direct taxes although only 1.2% of the tax filers paid taxes.

Recapitalisation, NPAs and Basel III

http://www.moneylife.in/article/banks-recapitalisation-i-the-need-is-rs5-lakh-crore-to-meet-basel-iii-capital-norms/52166.html

http://www.moneylife.in/article/banks-recapitalisation-ii-4-measures-that-will-help-banks-survive/52178.html

Post demonetisation, banks were flush with funds and yet credit did not pick up. Blame was on the surging NPAs that decimated the risk appetite of the Banks. The whole country is now aware that NPAs of corporate borrowers is the villain of the piece. Banks for once stopped blaming the priority sector for the unsustainable level of NPAs.

PSBs have their liberal share and therefore FM announced recapitalization of the order never seen before at Rs.2.11trillion. To call these reforms is a travesty of judgement. Average tax paying person has to bite the bullet. It has the potential for moral hazard.

Ethics and Governance in Banks in India

Banking reforms should target ethics and governance

Dr B Yerram Raju  and  Vikas Singh
02 May 2017 14  

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has put four banks on its critical watch list and warned another ten to spruce up their capital. What prompted the RBI to do this is anybody’s guess. Both the warning and action are sorely needed.

Huge bank frauds are reported, many of them from public sector banks (PSBs). An analysis of both frauds and the increasing non-performing assets (NPAs) suggests that the attention of banks to their basic functions of deposit and credit has diminished in the wake of their search for non-banking products like mutual funds and insurance, which offer hefty commissions to all cadres of officers. 

Neither the PJ Nayak Committee’s suggested governance reforms, leading to the setting up of the Bank Board Bureau (BBB) for selection of directors and chairpersons, nor Indra Dhanush seem to have improved the governance of banks. There is deep erosion in values and governance, in PSBs in particular and the Indian financial system in general.

Consolidation of Banks is no cure to the Ills

James Crabtree of the FT reporting on the predicament of the then PM Singh commented in March 2012 that Indian Banking was at the brink and needed heavy capital infusion to catch up with Basel III requirements and clean up to measure up to the requirements of economic growth to revive to beyond 7%.

The position worsened ever since. Gyan Sangam (Intellectual Confluence), the second after the formation of the present government that discussed the revamp of the banks a couple of days back at Gurgaon, Delhi have not offered any better wisdom than loud whispers of consolidation of banks. Is consolidation of banks the right solution?

Budget 2016 Transformational Budget

Karl Marx once said speaking of the goals of economic satisfaction: ‘each according to his needs’ (communists achieved it); ‘each according to his ability’ (capitalists achieved it) -- extend this to each according to his greed (modern economies surpassed). Democracy means great expectations and the FM has to meet these expectations in the most unenviable challenging environment.

The stunning defeat in the States’ elections during the year made the FM look at Rural India, agriculture, irrigation and infrastructure in this budget as key to regain its political prominence. Noses ground to the soil made different voices allocating more than 8% of the budget 16-17 to agriculture, rural development and irrigation. The Economic Survey forebode it to a degree.

Economic Survey 2016 read between the lines indicates that the economy would travel in uncertain growth territory due to weak growth of world output (around 3%), declining commodity markets, turbulent financial markets, and volatile exchange rates. The current expectation of 7-7.75% growth during the current year and 8% in the succeeding years is the hopeful. Agriculture sector constituting around 15% of GDP at current prices having 60% of population dependent on it just ended with 1.1%; manufacturing with Make-in-India push surged to 9.5% and services in spite of start-up and digital India efforts slackened to 10.1%.  Unless manufacturing start-ups attract angel funds in a big way it would be difficult to show a double digit growth in the sector as the credit markets are weak.

Mergers and Acquisitions among Indian Banking?

Banking Sector Reforms Committee in 1998 itself suggested consolidation of banks –the SBI and Associates into a big state-owned bank and five or six such big banks through consolidation of other PSBs, mergers of private banks and even FIs with NBFCs. There were noises of consolidation in the UPA-1 government too. And now, the Working Group on mergers and acquisitions set up by the Union Ministry of Finance again called for a similar action.  The major issues relating to capital, assets and human resources need to be looked at from the points of view of growth, financial stability and global experiences. Chairman SBI Arundhati Bhattacharya recently strongly fielded the arguments for large scale consolidation. Is the Indian financial system ripe for the call?