Banking
Reforms the Budget should not miss
Former
President of India, Pratibha Patil, in her address to the Lok Sabha on 4th
June 2009 said: “Our immediate priorities and programmes must be to focus on
the management of the economy that will counter the effect of global (domestic)
slowdown by a combination of sectoral and macrolevel policies.” She laid
emphasis on accelerating growth that is ‘socially and regionally more
inclusive’.
The objective of overall policy in India is accelerated inclusive
growth with macroeconomic stability. This approach is likely to reverberate in
the ensuing Budget Session.
FM needs to
give a measured response to the imperative outlined. In order to take the
States on board, she may announce clearance of all the dues on GST to the
States once the present audit of GST concludes. She may also like to give a new
financial sector reform agenda to resolve the existing imbroglio. A few of the
available options will be the focus of this article.
FM is at
crosshairs between fiscal austerity and enhancing public spending to stimulate
growth. Discomfort lies in the worst performance of Public Sector
Banks (PSBs) and failure of NBFCs. While the RBI is
balancing inflation and growth objectives, the recently released Financial Stability
Report re-emphasis on the need for ‘good governance across board’, improving the performance of PSBs and the
necessity to build buffers against
their disproportionate operational risk losses.
None of the recent bank mergers added to her comfort. Hence
there is need to look at the unfinished earlier reform agenda suggested by
various Committees since 1991 and announce either a Reform Agenda or
appointment of a High-Level Committee with a specific timeframe for actionable
agenda that could stonewall criticism against the PSB failures, bank frauds and
twin balance sheet problems.
The issues surrounding banking are not peripheral.
The moral hazard consequence of banks receiving bailout is
worrisome now and therefore, she may refrain from any further bailout
announcement. Stress in the NBFCs and Cooperative banking seemed to have forced
re-look at the Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance Bill, 2017. While the
Bill proposes to establish a Resolution Corporation to monitor the health of
the financial providers on an ongoing basis, the bail-in by depositors and
stakeholders is worrisome.
Increasing stress in various buckets of assets stands
unabated and calls for a surgical strike. Banks’ credit origination risks need
urgent evaluation. It is important to relook at the universal banking model the
country adopted aping the west. Customer preferences and customer rights have
taken a back seat.
Market-led reforms of the past have replaced social banking
with profit-banking objective. 2025 $5trn GDP target should look at more
efficient performance of banking as key to its achievement. There is a need for
reconciling satisfactorily the dilemma of policies appropriate for short term with
those suitable for the long term.
Governor, RBI in a recent address indicated that he would
like to look at the priority sector categorization afresh to ensure that it
delivers the intended. This assumes greater importance in financial inclusion
agenda as efforts hitherto like Jandhan, Mudra etc could make only numerical
and not qualitative advances. Provision of adequate and timely credit to the
rural areas in general and agriculture, micro and small enterprises and weaker
and vulnerable sectors, remained a major challenge for Indian banks for decades.
Direct credit programmes in Korea, Japan in 1950s and 1980s
revealed the need for narrowly focused and nuanced programmes with sunset
clauses delivered the results. The problem with directed credit is essentially
three-fold: First, pricing at its true market level, second, avoidance of the
persons who are not credit-constrained, and third, selection of focused areas
and regions without political interference in undefined democracy.
Credit discipline and equity, the twin principles of credit
dispensation suffered a systemic failure with politically motivated loan
write-offs in several States. Both farm and micro and small enterprises require
credit with extension, handholding, monitoring and supervision as key
deliverable. This calls for out-of-the-box thinking.
While there has been broad recognition that increasing
supply to cope with the rising demand through diversified lending institutions
like small finance banks, and NBFCs of various hues, ever-increasing demand to
cope with new technologies, low labour productivity, and absence of aggregators
structurally to resolve the pricing of produce at the farmer’s doorstep, are
all issues that require comprehensive solutions. Resources should not fall
short of the requirement for such effort. Budget 2020-21 should make a bold and
strategic announcement regarding the direction of investments in farm sector
supportive for responsible credit flow. FM would do well to avoid announcing
any crop loan targets and leave it to the RBI’s priority sector reformulation.
Supply-side issues cannot be adequately and appropriately
addressed without institutional reforms focusing restructuring NABARD and giving
a new mandate consistent with the future goals of the economy. SIDBI the second
surviving DFI is living on interest arbitrage and enjoying the munificence of
the Finance Ministry to the detriment of the sector it was intended to protect
and promote. This also begs either closure or restructuring.
As regards governance of banks, the unattended reforms of Narasimham
Committee -II deserve attention: Removing 10% voting rights; reducing the
legally required public shareholding in PSBs from 51 to 33 percent; improving
the Boards qualitatively with well-defined independent and functional
directors’ roles.
Since the FM already announced that she is exploring the
amendment to the Cooperative Act to skip the duality of regulation of
cooperative banks by both the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and RBI, she
would be going one step further in eliminating similar duality between her
Department of Banking and RBI in so far as the PSBs are concerned, particularly
because the RBI created separate Departments of Supervision and Regulation and
College of Supervisors to improve the supervisory skills of RBI personnel.
the Hindu Business Line, 16.1.2020 https://t.co/eNEANVcaW8?amp=1
No comments:
Post a Comment