Showing posts with label Inequality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Inequality. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 20, 2024

Character & Competence

 

I am tempted to republish this article in this blogpost as the nation needs to rethink, reinvigorate and move forward to reach its visionary goal of becoming a developed nation. 

Character and Competence  

 

 

B Yerram Raju 

 

Economist and Founder-Director, Telangana Industrial Health Clinic Ltd. Co-Author of the book ‘A Saint in the Board Room’ (2011)

 

Global Inequality Report 2022 mentioned that top 10 percent earn as much as the bottom 64 percent. India’s policy reforms during the last two decades saw high growth and high inequality levels intermittently. Quite often we also witness confrontation between the legislatures and Courts. We have also come across persons of acknowledged high competence landing in jail. Why?   

 

Sustainable and inclusive growth demands both competence and character. In order to define competence and character, and seeing the paths of their convergence, some storytelling becomes necessary.

 

The McKinsey Global Institute’s latest research on human development in Mapusa, a small town along a historic trade route in Goa, and in Porto, the second largest city in Portugal, unfolds “the story of both places that had virtually the same GDP per capita of $33,000 in 2019. At the country level, they are worlds apart: India’s GDP per capita was $6,700 (Purchasing Power Parity) or US$1941.82 in 2019, compared to $34,900 in Portugal—overall more than five times less.” 

 

Nevertheless, we are witnessing a few reputed leaders of self-aggrandisement and self-esteem directing the nation into the debris of material prosperity while a few others are wedded to the development of society. Hence, there is a strong need for recalling the basic principles of living that our inherent culture taught us emphasising competence with character.

 

S Radhakrishnan, the philosopher-statesman of India, said: “The ideal man of India is not the magnanimous man of Greece or the valiant warrior of medieval Europe but the free man of spirit who has attained insight into the universal source by rigid discipline and the practice of the disinterested virtues. He has freed himself from the prejudices of his time and place.” Indian heritage lies in humanism and universality. This sets the tone for redefining character and competence as traits of individuals and corporates. 

 

Wheels within Wheels

Meta, Amazon, Google, Wipro, Microsoft etc, are in no mood to keep their roasters intact. Jobs are removed in tens of thousands. NINJA (no income no job, no asset) had set in again. Banks and housing, and real estate companies are scared of their recoveries. Rising interest rates, lowering consumption sentiments, volatile markets, and untamed inflation are at the beginning of a new end. 

 

India, for the moment, seems to make a difference, raking in higher than expected revenues in GST and GDP growth forecast from the CRISIL placing it at 6 percent and Nomura at 5 percent in ‘23-‘24. When winter sets in, can spring be far behind?

 

Pure economics defies answers to many problems confronting society, while behavioural economics does offer solutions if character and competence move like two wheels of the forgotten bullock cart. 

 

If persons of character are afraid of their shadow and fail to take decisions keeping in mind the three ‘angel-robed demons – Central Vigilance Commission, Central Bureau of Investigation and Comptroller-cum-Auditor General’, competence in them takes a backseat. Autonomy, transparency, and timeliness in taking decisions never mean ignoring rules and regulations.

 

Lack of character is different from failure of character. Lack of character is unpardonable while failures are remediable. People who fail should be given an opportunity to correct and they should be made clear about the boundaries and consequences of the failure.

In Chapter 13 of Bhagavad Gita, (Kshetra, Kshetragjna Vibhaga Yogam), Lord Krishna defines the character: ‘Amanitvamadambhitvam, Ahimsaakshantirarjavam, Acharyopasanam, Saucham, Sthyryamatmavinigrahah’. The substance of the sloka is that a person with character should be devoid of pride and disrespect; should be humble, patient, and steady; should be able to have control over his self; be clean and clear in thinking and have restraint. We are at a point where we know what is right but are hesitant to adopt it. The Supreme Court had to pull up a plaintiff over the penalty sought on YouTube for airing what he preferred to see. 

 

High Character, Low Competence

How do we handle people on our leadership team who evidence the highest character, and the best motives, but are incapable of doing effective work? In a matrix of competence and character, fixing such people would be difficult. Organisations also skip them while mapping coaching and mentoring persons for results and sustainable growth. The loss is to the organisation and not to that person.

 

If we can draw a matrix of high character with high competence, high character with low competence, low character with high competence, low character with low competence in a Board of Governors, we will be able to establish the reasons for the failure of many a corporate who got the best ratings but ended up as disasters. 

 

The high character – high competence scenario will automatically lead to a high corporate governance (CG) scenario. But one without the other will not lead to a good CG scenario. It is said, “Economics without ethics is empty, and ethics devoid of economics is limp”.

 

We did not learn our lessons after the 2008 recession. The proverbial Vijay Mallyas proliferated and none of the cases of misgovernance and colossal bank losses got resolution. Over a decade of arguments in the highest courts of jurisprudence, involving malfeasance, misappropriation, corporate failures, and bad governance still defy resolution. On top of it, even the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code gives the longest rope for resolution and those resolved, benefitted the errand.  

 

It is hard to disagree with EV Ramasamy Naicker, a Tamil philosopher of the 20th century, who said, “When I used to carry heavy bags during my younger days, my back would bend due to the weight, but not due to shame. Being straightforward and having less food is far better than diluting our character and taking lots of rich and quality food.”

 

The history of today’s wealthiest nation tells us about what happened between 1923 and 1948:

-        President of the largest steel company, Charles Schwab, lived on borrowed capital for five years before he died bankrupt.

-        President of the largest gas company, Howard Hudson, went insane.

-        One of the greatest commodity traders, Arthur Catton, died insolvent.

-        President of the New York Stock Exchange, Richard Whitney, was sent to jail.

-        A member of the President’s Cabinet, Albert Fall, was pardoned from jail to go home and die in peace.

-        The greatest ‘bear’ on Wall Street, Jessie Livermore committed suicide.

-        President of the world’s greatest monopoly, Ivar Krueger committed suicide.

-        President of the Bank of International Settlement, Leon Fraser committed suicide.

It was the pursuit of money to the exclusion of other goals that caused them their downfall.

 

Market behaviour largely depends on individual investor behaviour like buying-high-selling-low or buying-low-selling-high. Behaviour here largely is related to the character and not pockets. This character is typically borne of greed and not need. It is more like a honeybee that flits from one flower to another, sucking honey as it flies. But when it perches on its hive, it stops humming. 

 

Man is made by his own beliefs. ‘As he believes, so is he.’ (Bhagavat Gita). Henry David Thoreau may have told in different words, the same thing: ‘What a man thinks of himself: that is what determines, or rather indicates his fate.’

  

We need resilient boards of companies that can build teams of executives with foresight, virtuous and timely response, and adaptation capabilities.

 

India is at the cusp of change and the dream of India 2050 has to be realised by a generation that is seeing the garbage at the foot of the hill. They should be directed to reach the top of a mountain and every step counts. It is competence with character that should enable a crowning future. 

https://epaper.telanganatoday.com/Home/ArticleView?eid=1&edate=20/01/2023&pgid=48693

 

  

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Balanced Growth is Essential for Democracy




The fabric of democracy depends on the social and economic consequences of the amendments to the Constitution at a critical time in India’s economic history. Agitations have caused loss of lot of man-days and diversion of productive time.  Timing of change is important for the success of change. This article does not intend to discuss the merits or otherwise of the latest amendments to the Constitution – either Article 370 annulment or CAA. The focus will be on the consequences of the economics of democracy and not so much the politics.

In democracy, it is the voice of the people expressed through the electoral vote. We have seen that the vote bank rarely touched even 30 percent of eligible population. People who caste their votes have mostly been the less endowed and widely spread across all religions and castes and this has little prospect of change.

One of the world's largest democracies had to wait for its day to overtake china's growth rate as consensus doesn't come about without discussion and lot of deliberation. Centralised planning of the Maholnobis-Nehruvian model though conceived well to usher in socialistic pattern of society let off the principles of federalism to come up with an experiment with Niti Aayog whose results are yet to be on the dashboard of India. Development is more than growth.

Ethnic, cultural, and religious diversity apart multiple languages form the Indian Union. This diversity is both its strength and weakness. States formed on linguistic basis with some of them larger than several countries had uneven natural endowments, and imbalances in the dispensation of resources at the hands of central government.

Notwithstanding the average nominal growth of 8% between 2007-12, human development indices ranked India at 129. 12.1cr (2011) population is covered by 24.95cr households with average habitat population of slightly less than 5 per household. Poverty levels have gone down in rural areas from 50% in 1993-94 to 23% in 2016-17 and in urban areas correspondingly from approximately 32% to around 13%. Rural roads constitute 70.2% of the total length of roads across the country. Quite a few States have made CC roads instead of metal roads. As per 71st round of NSS, Literacy levels too have gone up significantly to 69.1% by 2014.

Goldman Sachs' estimated an average of 8% per annum during 2016-20 notwithstanding the prevailing global turbulence. So did all the leading predictions from KPMG and McKinsey. Although the NDA government announced the goals of good governance and cooperative federalism, both remain still at the goalposts.

Unless States are taken on board in this second largest democracy of the world, prospects of sustained growth remain elusive. As at the end of March 2018, eleven of the twenty-nine States (now 31 and 7 Union territories) showed consistently high growth during the period 2014-18. If the nation were to attain the lofty goal of $5trn by 2024-25, the rest of 20 should also join the minimum 8% growth level. Bihar (14.50%), Chattisgarh (11.20%); Goa (14%), Karnataka (12.00); Madhya Pradesh (around 18%); Maharashtra (10.6%); Tamil Nadu (12.30%); Telangana (14.10%); Uttarakhand (11.20); West Bengal (16.10%) and a few North Eastern States like Assam, Meghalaya also lead the list. 

Government of India would do well to lend all support to these leading States and push the other lagging States through sustainable interventions in infrastructure, communications, transport and tourism without giving scope for them to feel a partisan approach. All the Global Investment opportunities should have equitable spread.

Vice President in a recent Address mentioned that 479 Parliamentarians are crorepatis. The State Legislatures also are crowded with such crorepatis. Latest Oxfam Report (Jan 20, 2020) laments “Economic inequality is out of control. In 2019, the world’s billionaires, only 2,153 people, had more wealth than 4.6 billion people.” The Report attributes this to gender inequality and unpaid Care work at home by women. The richest 1% have more than twice the wealth of the 6.9bn people.

One good suggestion for the Finance Minister at the right time: taxing 0.5% of the richer 1% for the next 10years would be equal to investment needed for 117mn jobs in education, health and elderly care. Good governance demands that these rich sections shall not receive subsidies of the order currently prevailing.

Availability of health services, supply of drinking water remains inadequate and costly. Availability of liquor, however, has enhanced adding significantly to the State revenues. Both are causes of concern for the future of a healthy democracy.

The World Bank projected that India, along with Brazil, China, Indonesia, South Korea, and Russia, will account for more than half of the global growth by 2025 with an average annual growth rate of 4.7 per cent between 2011 and 2025. While this prediction is likely to undergo change in the context of current slowdown not just in India but in all the major economies in the world, there is no chance for India to alter its growth vision.

Addressing the resource constraints (mainly water, energy, infrastructure and investing more in human development (mainly public health and education) is important to realize India’s growth potential. Consensual approach is the essence of a successful democracy. India does not have the luxury of being otherwise.

(All the latest data is sourced from the Report of the Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation, Government of India, 2018: www.mospi.gov.in )