Hopes, Aspirations and Disappointments - Union Budget 2020

Hope, Aspirations and Disappointments

Nirmala Sitaraman starts on Aspirational Note. The two hour forty minute long budget speech creating record could perhaps prove the dictum: ‘if you fail in logic resort to rhetoric.’ Let me deal with the hopes and aspirations first and then with the disappointments later.

It has for first time addressed the farm sector comprehensively providing end-to-end solutions but leaves no assurance for income in the hands of the farmer. Allied activities get a boost. If a farmer were to hold a few animals in the backyard, a fishpond and a small poultry in addition to crop farming or horticulture, he has everything in the budget to cheer. There is every chance to cross-hold risks among the farming and allied activities.

States should follow the intent and modify the Agricultural Marketing laws to make way for the responsible aggregators and technology. Warehousing facilities in the Agriculture Market Yards and cold storage facilities would insulate the farmer from fluctuations in returns to the farm produce.

FM has announced Rs.15lakh farm credit amidst unwelcoming banker in the rural areas and banks that have learnt the art of showing up in figures that they do not deliver to the intended customers. It is heartening to see the push for Primary Agricultural Credit Societies that were almost forgotten for decades. NABARD that has half of its fleet serving Mumbai Headquarters should have been restructured for focused attention on farm credit. She should have forsaken tolerance for not achieving priority sector targets to take the RIDF window. This is a lost opportunity.

While the erstwhile lost focus on Education, Health and Hygiene has been regained with appropriate budget allocations and set a new direction through internships in higher education, unless infrastructure for primary education and teaching skills are enhanced the foundations will remain weak. Introducing internships in higher education has potential to make education fit the employment bill. We may hope for a correction through the National Education Policy the Government is planning to introduce.

The District Teaching Hospitals and para medical services planned will sow the seeds for sustainable health interventions. This just marks only a good beginning as the effect can be felt only after five years.

With the measly allocation for MNREGS and not linking it to the farm sector the budget left a void. It failed to kindle the appetite for consumption, the trigger for growth. The consumer is not left with much surpluses either for increased investment or consumption. Growth impulses are not generated significantly.

MSME sector has got a new direction with the introduction of sub-ordinated debt or equity funding but it remains to be seen whether the Banks that failed them in credit would meet the new equity route and help scaling up process. TReDs and GEMs are not new interventions to talk of. Unless all the government departments and PSUs enroll on these platforms, MSM|E vendors would not get their due. For those moving to organized way of doing business with just 5% in cash are exempt from audit up to Rs.5cr turnover.

In the last budget, the FM made a reference to U.K. Sinha Committee Report, but she skipped it now. Neither Distressed Asset Fund to ensure that no viable manufacturing MSME downs its shutters, nor Fund of Funds found allocation in the Budget. In a slowdown, it makes lot of sense to ensure that no viable manufacturing MSME exits so that the workforce engaged therein would not add to the unemployed. 

Economic Survey 2020 made a very detailed analysis of the banking in the financial sector. FM did not seem much worried over the increase in frauds and poor credit risk of the Banks. Although it is heartening to see that no further capital allocation is made cutting into taxpayer’s purse, it is disappointing to see the absence of reforms in this sector. It would have been most appropriate to reduce the Government equity in these banks and usher in better governance than now. Bad banking and good economy are not good companions.

Banks irrespective of their size, in the current status will pull down the growth of the economy. The only solace is to the depositor whose Rs.5lacs is insured instead of just a lakh of rupees thus far. NBFCs are empowered to recover their bad debts through the SARFAESI Act provisions on par with Banks.

Extraordinary push to the digital economy with District Cyber Parks, AI, MML and ITES in addition to Travel and Tourism is likely to enhance the contribution of the Services sector. Start up, Stand Up India and Make in India have not thus far led to increase in the contribution of manufacturing sector and this budget also did not make significant strides to reverse the negative growth. Telangana State seemed to have provided inspiration on this count.

Agriculture sector alone may not reverse the slow growth of the economy. Employment intensity has little scope to increase. Unless 20% credit -GDP ratio is attained with better risk appetite among banks, recovery from slow growth is doubtful.

If both the government and private entities depend on market for raising the resources as indicated in the Budget, revised estimates of the budgeted revenues and expenditure fall short of growth expectations. The Budget failed to institute a monitoring mechanism for implementation of the ambitious projects. States should be taken into confidence while formulating the Budget as it is the States that should catch up and cooperate for the aspirational goals and ambitious announcements to turn into actions.

Intention of the FM to keep more money in the hands of the people did not result in compatible actions. Overall on a ten-point scale the Budget scores a liberal six, more due to comprehensive treatment to the farm sector than other sectors.

Published in Telangana Today 5^th February 2020.