Budget 2013: Bold initiatives needed in a tough year ahead.
In the political context of the
nation, it is difficult to expect the Budget 2013 would either be path breaking
or reformist. General Elections are due in 2014 and the 2014 Budget would
therefore be vote-on-account budget. The current budget is in the backdrop of
low growth continuously for two years both in agriculture and manufacturing
with no early hope of revival, unabated inflation albeit marginal fluctuations
and rising current account deficit- the highest so far at 5.2%. Fiscal Budgetary
Management has already been put on the backburner. RBI has put out a report on
State Finances this month that dries up any further hope on States coming to
the rescue of the Centre in containing the fiscal cliff we are nearing. FM started
his discussions with the stakeholders to see where he can gain the corners.
One of the fundamental principles
of taxation is: at the higher levels of income, the tax has to be progressive
and at the lower level, regressive. The Direct Tax code kept this in view. It
is not unlikely that as the system matures and cash economy gets lessened, the
tax rates would be further rationalized from the existing three slabs of 10, 20
and 30 percent of the taxable income. All exemptions shall be withdrawn. But at
the moment there seems to be remote possibility for any further rationalization
of rates.
The recent hike in fuel and gas
prices and the rationalization of related subsidies as also the rise in rail
passenger fares leave no hope of inflation coming down. Monetary policy of the
RBI towards the fag end of this month may at best make marginal changes bowing
to pressures of the stakeholders and the government. Leaving to itself the RBI
should prefer to keep the rates unchanged. Hence the fiscal measures are the
only remedy.
Incentives for investments should come from the growth rather than
through the exemptions and fiscal management. The measures to ensure growth
need not necessarily come from patting the rich and an open invitation to the
dollar economy to take over India. In the context of our poor rank in the
league of nations at 97 out of 131 in the Economic Freedom Index, it is time to
revisit the perverse incentives in health and education sectors and reverse
them. If the FM tackles health and education sectors and increases investments
to ensure good health, safe drinking water, universal free education up to
class X, growth will emerge as a natural process due to enhanced people’s
ability to work hard, save a good pie for productive consumption and healthy
recycling of the economy.
My suggestion would be: let each
corporate hospital provide 20% of every type of health service to the poor,
women, and senior citizens on the basis of Aadhar and all such cost incurred by
the Corporate should be qualified for exemption of tax. Similarly, all
educational institutions that admit 20% of the students belonging to the poor for
providing learning and learning tools, again on the basis of Aadhar
information, not on the basis of caste or creed shall be also similarly exempt
from tax. Universal education would be a goal nearer to achievement in the
process.
In fact, I would venture to
suggest that the best way to reduce imbalance and ensure growth is through
increasing the share transaction tax from the current level of just 0.15% to
0.35% at both the ends of the transaction. There will be a hue and cry immediately
after such increase but the dust would settle down eventually. The philosophy
behind is that the buyer sells for a future gain and the seller sells for
avoiding immediate loss (a loss of expected surplus). In a way both are
gainers. The tax is paid out of only the surplus. The tax is not going to be
regressive just because it is done at both ends of the transaction. The tax
collection expenses is almost nil as the de-mat account generates the tax
payable, deducts at source and immediately it gets into the Government
Treasury. There is no tax collector or tax inspector here. The tax income so
collected is available to the Government immediately for investment in either
social expenditure like the pensions payable to the widows, physically handicapped
and the like or for meeting the natural calamities immediately after their
occurrence. Actually, to this extent even the corporate tax structure can be
rationalized from the subsequent years. This would help the Fiscal
Responsibility Budget Management significantly.