Farm Loan Waiver - No longer, the need.

 

                                  Courtesy: The Hindu

Farm Loan Waivers – No longer the need

B. Yerram Raju                                                                                   

From corporates to the individuals, irrespective of activity, want their loans to be waived. Who wants to live in debt? But can the economy giving such waivers live without debt? Simply put, a firm ‘No’. The rising public debt of the sovereign puts not just the present but the future citizen in debt for it is the next generation that has the responsibility to repay. Farm sector is not just exception, but the future is not just generation away but only a crop season away. This should clear the way for the argument against the loan waivers of any kind save very serious exceptions.

Politicians and farmers are good friends close to the elections and bad enemies to farm economics. Rahul Gandhi stirred the hornet’s nest at Warangal on the 6^th May while announcing that if Congress is elected to power in Telangana, it would waive off Rs.2lakhs for each farmer from his debt portfolio. Such slogans pre-elections are not new to the farmers, ever since V.P. Singh/Charan Singh duo indulged in crop loan write-off in 1990s. The scheme received the ire of Comptroller and Auditor General for its bad implementation. RBI repeatedly advised the political parties not to indulge in this luxury as the states do not have that much resource apart from encouraging bad borrower behaviour. But do all farmers look for such write-off? What exactly they need?

Doubling farm income remained a far-cry leading scores of farmers to double-up to Delhi to fight against what they considered as bad farm laws. The much-needed farm reforms that were bypassed during the first phase of reforms in the 1990s could have been triggered had there been political sagacity and cooperative federalism. Be that as it may, it has become difficult for governments to do what the farmers want, save the exception of government of Telangana, that I would explain latter. There are good number of farmers who took to mixed farming, organic farming, natural farming, and use of technologies intensely.

Farmer is generally short of cash at the beginning of the crop season. This leads him/her to go to the money lender who is wont to give credit on his own terms. The revenue from his previous crop would not be to hand at that moment as it would have been up for sale but not sold. If he had no dairy or poultry or allied activity to come to his rescue, even family would be on the brink of starvation despite his four or five acres of land!

Government of Telangana is the first government to think of giving Rs.10000 at the beginning of the season in cash. It also arranged for insurance against untoward calamity in the family while working on the farm -  may be a snakebite or an accident or loss in family up to Rs.5lakhs. Both these schemes are monitored by the Chief Minister to ensure that there is no slip up in the releases. The result is that farmer does not have to wait at the banker’s gate for a loan! On top, all the 789  Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies in Telangana have been digitized and linked to core banking solutions of  around 298 DCCB -branches and State Cooperative Bank. This opened a reliable credit window for the farmers when credit is needed. Marketing paddy, the principal crop of the state is engaged in a street fight between the union and state. The result, however, is good as the farmers realized that they should go more for alternate crops that have better markets and yield better price. When asuras and devas churned the ocean, both milk and poison emerged and the churning is still on.

Illustratively, Saritha, a commerce postgraduate from Rapakapalle village in Hanumakonda district took to zero budget natural farming on her four-acre land. She collected rainwater to farm a fishpond; honeybee-keeping, polyhouse for vegetable cultivation and an acre of paddy cultivation. She established two retail outlets for her farm produce and multiplied her farm income. She is proud to say that she could hedge the risks of farming through mixed farming as one or the other agricultural activity gets her sustainable income year-long. She also influenced two thousand farmers in and around her village. There are many more of her ilk in Telangana.

Credit for farming is a necessary but not sufficient condition for sustainability because farmer’s liquidity is always locked up either in soil or silo. As long as farmer’s credit requirement is viewed in exclusion for production purposes alone, the empty valet of farmer stares at the banker. In spite of nearly five decades of engagement of banks with farmers, bankers have no trust in them. Similarly, farmers also lack confidence in banks that they would meet their genuine requirements in time. It will be interesting to see from the RBI data that the banks lent to farming mostly in irrigated tracts – nearly 83% of lending took place in just twelve states. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) took up watershed programme on a mission mode that helped many water-starved tracts could get crop-relevant water using latest technologies. Kisan Credit Card has become a fancy instrument that did not give credit comfort to the farmer. Revisiting this instrument and modifying its delivery mechanism is more imminent now than ever.

The banks’ concerns are equity and discipline while the farmers’ concerns are adequacy, timeliness, and multipurpose credit – production, consumption, and marketing. Farming unlike any other activity is prone to risks arising from natural calamities and each calamity is different in nature and dimension.

Chanakya in his magnum opus Artha Sastra clearly mentions that if a natural calamity like cyclone, holocaust, continuous drought for over two years, repeated floods, tsunami etc., it is the responsibility of the state to bail out the farmers by relieving him from all the debt and give cash to him for sustenance. He never advocated loan write-off as it would debilitate the farmer of his own capacities and creates trust-deficit with his lender. Strengthen the insurance mechanism for farming sector. Make available lending to farmer at no more than four percent per annum. Announce the produce price well ahead of the season. Interest reimbursement is a budget game and put an end to it.

It has become a fashion for all the political parties to announce loan write-off from the state exchequer. It is difficult to imagine that they are ignorant of the consequences. But they indulge in this political ploy. A responsible democracy like ours shall refrain from such sloganeering and Election Commission should impose a ban on such announcements.

The views are author’s own.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/fincorp/farm-loan-waivers-no-longer-the-need/

 

 

 

Recession - Far and yet Near.

 Opinion: On edge with recession fears https://telanganatoday.com/opinion-on-edge-with-recession-fears

Recession? Near and yet Far.

B. Yerram Raju

Several economists, in the wake of Russia-Ukraine war and the rise of global inflation index, have been talking of recession. It is important to understand the meaning of recession. It occurs when there is contraction of demand for goods and services consecutively for two quarters; employment falls precipitously; consumption declines; both exports and imports fall; credit markets shrink and finally, the GDP declines. This means that all the macro-economic indicators show an alarming trend.

In layman’s language, when your neighbour loses his job, it is recession, while depression is, when you lose your job. Before going into the macro-economic indicators that prompted such prediction, the discussion is timely because price stability is viewed as necessary precondition for growth by the authors of the Currency and Finance Report (RBI), 2021-22. This is the wake up call to the Monetary Policy Committee meeting on May 2 and 4 calling for a rate hike close to the rate hike in Fed-US.

Impact of global recession is seen in the backdrop of Covid-19 variants making aggressive re-entry unnerving many economies. Externalities like Russia-Ukraine war, collapse of Sri Lanka in our immediate neighbourhood, strained global value chains added fuel to fire. Fuel prices are not likely to relent in the short term and edible oil prices are touching the roof.

A bit of History

Unprecedented banking crises in the past triggered recession both in advanced economies and emerging economies. Advanced economies: Herstatt crisis in Germany, Japan in 90s, Norway in 1988-92, Spain in 1985, Sweden in 1985, UK in 1995, USA in 1980s to early 90s, and emerging economies: Brazil 1994, East Asian Crisis in 1997 hitting Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, and the subprime crisis of 2006 hitting the whole world are examples of recession if we leave 1930 recession way behind. The Economist, London in its special report of May 16,2009 said: ‘the dirty secret of the golden age of finance was that it was obscenely easy to make money.” Interest rates rose and housing prices fell.

Rate Hike:

Latest hike in the basic rates announced by Governor Shaktikant in a huddle on May 5,2022 shocked the stock markets. Lenders, rating agencies, and investors commented that this hike is just the beginning in the wake of unrelenting inflation for the past three quarters in a row.

Gross Domestic Product:

The most important macroeconomic factor is decline in GDP {[C+I+G+(x-m)], where C= consumption; I=investment; G=Government spending; x= exports and m=imports} . Total goods and services produced in the economy declines. Currency and Finance Report (CFR 21-22), mentioned that economic growth slowed down since the second half of 2016, taking the average of GDP growth between 2017-20 fiscal to 5.7 percent. There is understandable decline post 2020 due to Covid-19 that saw irrecoverable loans in all segments, rents prohibited for more than a year in several states in 2020-21, unoccupied hotels and unmoved airbuses hitting tourism and aviation industry, several drivers losing their jobs and cabs parked in sheds with a steep fall in fuel consumption.

Inflation:

One must begin with inflation. Data released four days after the MPC's April 8 decision showed Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation saw a seventeen-month high of 6.95 percent in March. Wholesale inflation index rose to a four-month high of 14.55 percent the same month.  This data was in the RBI’s pages even three weeks before. Should it be behind the curve in announcing the rate hike for so long? A question that would have few answers from the powers that be. Money Control, a financial blog, vents its disappointment over the RBI Governor’s statement:” CPI inflation has been above the medium-term target of 4 percent for exactly two-and-half years. In these 30 months, CPI inflation has been above 5 percent 27 times and above the 6 percent upper bound of the RBI's flexible inflation target 16 times. So, to state now — after not saying anything in the last two years — that inflation expectations could get unanchored is a tad disconcerting.”

Unemployment:

CMIE data released almost simultaneously reveals that urban unemployment rate was 9.22 percent, and rural unemployment rate was at 7.18 percent.

International Trade

Trade balances were hit badly all over the world. Thanks to seizing the right opportunities, India’s trade balances moved to $400bn in April 2022. Several measures taken under Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan (self-reliant India) started yielding results. Startups swelled to encouraging levels. Thanks to agriculture and pharmaceutical sectors, the economy looked up during the covid time. There were no deaths due to hunger. More than 4.58crore population had been vaccinated – first, second, and precautionary and child vaccines together. To keep the export markets diversified, PM Modi is on Europe tour. This may also signal export markets that India is keen to see that the war between Russia and Ukraine ends sooner than later.

India’s consumption, growing at 12 percent pre-pandemic, nose-dived during the pandemic. But it recovered fast and is at 17 percent with a likely 10 percent annual growth in the next decade, according to Managing Partner, Boston Consulting Group. E-commerce is on the rise. It is likely to reach US $130bn by 2026.

For recession to set in there are certain conditions: Foreign capital should flee; people’s confidence should evaporate; stock markets should take a deep dive continuously; melt-down of global markets; tumbling currencies; flight of assets to safety; financial institutions blowing cold on credit; increasing government interventions in every sphere; federal politics on hostile note; and trust deficit in the governments. Banks will be on the nervous hook. Banks have always been on a weak wicket because of their inherent mismatch between the assets and liabilities. After digitalization, the risks went beyond their normal reach and added to that are the crypto currencies and cybercrimes.

Government asserts that and the RBI reinforces its argument in that growth is here to stay as banks, corporate enterprises and agriculture are all looking up. Credit from institutions for the second month in a row saw a rising trend. But unlike in 2006 crisis, Indian financial system is not a closeted financial system but exposed to global value chains.

Globally, forex markets nose-dived. Commodity markets are on continuous decline. Industrial production everywhere wears a disappointing look due to the war and continuing Covid-19 variants making economies nervous. Volatility exists in all the stock markets. Several FIIs are keen to pull back their investments.

It is this backdrop that still makes economists nervous to feel that recession is very likely.  India is far and yet near. It’s export thrust in the wake of volatile forex markets is enough cause for worry. Further, the freebies, rising public debt, indiscrete valuations of public assets put to sale, large official haircuts in official IBC resolutions need rethinking if India would escape recession. Next two months in a row, we may witness rate hikes to contain the galloping inflation.

The views expressed are author’s own.

 

Inflation - the hydra

 

Inflation – the hydra

B. Yerram Raju

Times of India Blogpost dated 29.04.2022.

Sweltering heat makes us look to June’s first monsoon showers as much as the monetary policy of the RBI looking at taming the inflation as its uppermost task. When Bloomberg mentions that the world is experiencing a synchronised inflation outbreak that previously seemed related to the US and Europe, and that producer prices are rising in Japan, South Korea, India, and all economies are feeling the heat of fuel and food prices, it has to be viewed seriously.

I tried to look at it from what is happening in the working class both in urban and rural areas in our country. Several state governments are indulging in competitive populism, notwithstanding the ever-rising fuel prices.

My house cleaner has a couple of acres of land in Mahbubnagar district of Telangana. She gets her minimum wages when she abstains from the work in our house, at least four days a month and seven days at least once in a quarter. Her logic: Every office has one Sunday and two second Saturdays as holidays. Why should I not get the same? She works as house cleaner for ten houses with an average income of Rs.2000 per month per household. She gets free ration; free medical treatment in the government hospital if she or her family members have illness or accident. Her husband is a fruit-seller on bicycle. His net income is Rs.15000 a month and recently he got a loan of Rs.10000 under the street vendors’ scheme that helped him buy a cooler to the house. She has put both her sons in a social welfare residential school. She is also not bothered about income tax though her family income exceeds the taxable income. She has Aadhar card and felt needless to have PAN card! She is least bothered about inflation.

In a chat with her, I and my wife realized that most house cleaners are in the same boat as her and they only have to pay rent. Some of them are also expecting to move to their own two-bedroom flat promised by the government. I went to a village on the way to a temple in Sangareddy district. That was a shandy day. Hence most villagers are in shandy either as buyers or sellers. I got down from the car, a little uncared for the anger of my wife. She knows that when I get down on such errand, I would take at least thirty to forty-five minutes to be back.

I enquired from around twenty persons regarding the price-rise. They mentioned only two things: one, Fuel price and two, Oil price. No others mattered to them. At least one person in every house has a motorcycle. Every family has a piece of land either owned or leased. They are bothered about the wages for the farm labour. They sky-rocketed. They are planning to go for farm machinery either in groups or go for hiring it to reduce farming costs. They are bothered more about increasing unrest in villages due to family feuds.

Inflation therefore has not figured much in the conversation. Rise in wages is an issue but related to inflation. Not that the rising inflation indices – consumer price indices crossing the RBI headline boundaries – is not a worry. The fact is that there are several factors that do not get into inflation accounting. The rents in urban areas are on the rise despite a boom in real estate and housing and cheap housing loans.

If interest rates rise, the cause will not be so much the inflation as the non-performing loans in the retail sector, protracted corporate loan recoveries after severe haircuts, under the most permissive route of Indian Bankruptcy Code proceedings.

Union government has a responsibility to look at the fuel prices beyond the revenues that are earned out of them. Most of the states have genuine concerns over the cess and it is time to be transparent and remove all the cess as the purpose for which cess is levied and spent are never coordinated. For example, look at the similar rise in fuel prices globally in 2014 and 2015 and the domestic prices. Can we get back to the comparable barrel prices and retail prices of fuel and gas?

Once the interest rates rise, the scope for real interest rates to pare up and comfort the savers exists and the hapless senior citizens will have a sigh of relief. Real interest rates are currently negative and hopefully the June monetary policy of the RBI will bend the hydra.

*Author is an economist and risk management specialist and the views are his own.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/fincorp/inflation-the-hydra/

 

 

Access to Finance: MSMEs

 

Access to Finance – the Achilles Heel for the MSMEs

Economic restructuring followed by financial deregulation has brought in its wake the need for a change in the very mindset of credit analysts. Infusion of liquidity into banks has strengthened confidence in depositors more than the borrowers.

Share of MSMEs in GDP was of the order of 29 percent with a credit flow constituting 15% of the total credit disbursal of Banks and NBFCs. This amounts to approximately Rs.17trn. Government of India in its overreach to $5trn economy by 2022, has proposed that the share of MSMEs in GDP should reach 50%.

We have seen the most enticing schemes under Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan Scheme 1 reached only 55% in terms of disbursements, which targeted incremental credit of 20% working capital to the pandemic-struck standard assets in the MSME sector. In regard to the second scheme that targeted the sub-standard and NPAs for revival and provision of equity banks are shy to move fast – in a once bitten, twice shy mood.

It is unfortunate that we should be discussing this issue for decades despite a number of initiatives taken by the RBI and GoI. Priority sector guidelines have been modified allowing banks to co-lend with all NBFCs with no restrictions in order to push lending to this sector. The measure should enhance the risk appetite among banks by co-sharing the risks with the NBFCs. During the years 2015-20, borrowers’ accounting practices moved to the regulatory conformance zone. This should actually rebuild the lost trust among lenders and borrowers.

In Telangana, as many as 8,435 MSME units have commenced their operations since formation of the state, with an investment of about Rs.11,487crore. Since January 2015, MSMEs have provided additional employment opportunities to approximately 1.59 lakh persons.

While micro industries account for approximately 58.07% of total units, their share of investment and employment generation is comparatively less—11.92% and 30.12%, respectively. Small units account for 63.44% of total MSME investment and 55.41% of total MSME employment—the highest for both categories.

Telangana is the only State to have set up a separate institution to revive and restructure the manufacturing micro and small enterprises, viz., Telangana Industrial Health Clinic Ltd with a seed capital of Rs.100mn.

A couple of case studies would be in order where the TIHCL have been successful in not just reviving the enterprise but also substantially scale up their operations, save the lock-down period.

In times of uncertainty as now, investors hesitate to start new enterprises except in greenfield areas like the IT and Pharma. We should not allow the existing viable enterprises to shut their doors for want of some critical funding or margin money or buttressing his equity.

M/s. Deccan Pulverisers Private Limited promoted by two women entrepreneurs, engaged in manufacturing mineral powder from quartz/feldspar mineral stones, availed a term loan from SFC to the extent of Rs.6.2mn without any arrangement for working capital. State Government has sanctioned Rs.2.1mn as investment subsidy and other incentives.

The machinery was ordered as soon as the Financial Institution (FI) sanctioned the loan, but the installation of machinery was delayed from vendors end. The business did not receive expected export orders and the promoter searched for buyers in the local markets. In initial stages could not find an appropriate buyer who can pay in 60 days due to this the receivables were delayed and the payments to the FI were also delayed, FI started charging penal interest for the delayed payments.

In the meantime, the constructed factory shed was damaged due to heavy rains and cyclone, the entrepreneur repaired the shed from his own funds. The project was not feasible with one machine as the margins were too low in the local markets the promoter has installed a second machine with his own funds and increased the unit’s production capacity.

Due to irregularities in the repayment, FI has issued demand notice on 6^th September 2019 asking the unit to pay overdue interest and instalments amounting to ₹ 20 lacs by 1^st October 2019, failing which they will take further steps like legal action etc., The promoter and the company were in the great stress as it shattered their goals and dreams.

After a detailed diagnostic study and discussion with the SFC, we arrived at a revival package for the unit. We noticed that the high interest rate of 17% p.a., and delay in arrival were the principal reasons for the unit to turn incipient sick.

 

TIHCL has extended critical amount funding that enabled him to regularise his term loan account with the SFC. We also arranged for the priority release of incentive blocked for a year. The sword on their necks has been removed and they started production in January this year. But the pandemic struck, and they could restart production only in July this year. At present they attained 80% of their capacity utilization and a turnover of Rs,8.2mn. One of the PSBs agreed in principle to sanction working capital as well.

 Another enterprise, Suresh Textiles, a sole proprietary unit similarly shattered was assisted by the TIHCL. This entrepreneur with 20 years of weaving experience has set up 40 semi-automatic power looms initially. Later he converted them to fully automatic looms to produce shirting cloth in the year 2017. He started commercial production in 2019, the year of slow growth of the economy. The unit stopped its operations during the period of upgradation for nearly six months. During this stress period he approached the TIHCL for a solution.

Problems Identified by TIHCL-

·       Ab Initio sickness detected due to inadequate financing

·       Introduction of GST post-sanctioning of loan caused additional burden on proprietor as equity parked for working capital was utilized for GST payments on machinery.

·       Subsequently this caused cash crunch for production and unit became sick within one year from establishment.

 Revival Package-

TIHCL has conducted diagnostic study and found that the unit has suffered shortage of working capital due to external factors.  It has proposed to the primary lender for enhancing the limits for operating the unit. 

As proposed, primary lender has sanctioned additional loan of ₹14 lakhs and TIHCL has sanctioned margin loan of ₹3.73 lakhs along with the primary lender for the revival of the unit.  TIHCL now handholding and reviewing the unit periodically for efficient business operations and to control the stress in the unit.  

Overall, post revival and rehabilitation by TIHCL, the unit is performing well and improved chances of growing the business.  From nil capacity, the unit has reached 50% capacity utilization during the last three months and is confident of reaching 100% capacity in the next four months.  His experience taught him that raw material bought from outside the State would save the input costs by 15%. He is prompt in repaying the instalments and is now poised for growing big.

 Both the units have digitised their operations and installed ERP solution that enabled the TIHCL to monitor off-site the units’ performance regularly and guide the entrepreneurs.

 In more than 80% of the units that knocked our doors for support, we noticed that their working capital eroded with the banks debiting the instalments on the retail loans sanctioned to them – either for buying a car or home or both. Where the housing loan is taken this automatically collateralized the otherwise CGTMSE guaranteed loan. Their failure to repay due to the eroded working capital, turned them NPA and proceedings against their securities followed as a natural course. MSMEs were the first option of banks to lure them to retail loans, that became their thrust area. It is advisable for the MSMEs to take retail loans from banks other than those that granted them the working capital and also have proper financial planning for their personal assets and enterprise assets for growth.

 Transunion CIBIL has also announced a MSME Health Index based on two parameters – growth and development. Growth is based on the enterprises ability to access credit while development is assessed on the basis of NPA status in banks.

 Rating institutions are yet to come out with rating specifically targeting the manufacturing MSMEs. There are several issues in rating mechanisms and also the extension of guarantee by the CGTMSE. These need resolution for easy access to credit.

 Digitization of all enterprises does not brook delay. Telangana Government entered into an arrangement to provide free accounting software to 20000 enterprises to accelerate digitization. This will certainly bring transparency, accountability, and better compliance of the lending institutions’ terms and conditions of sanction thus rebuilding the lost trust among the banks and MSMEs.

 TIHCL is a co-lending institution and the banks that are interested to speed up their processes of revival and restructuring and take assistance for monitoring and supervision of their MSME assets are welcome to seek our support. Nothing comes free. But the costs that the enterprises and banks incur in their collaborative efforts with us are far minimal and we assure that their NPA portfolio would turn performing with their association with us.

 TIHCL has tailor made loan products for various types of stress faced by the MSEs and for women start-ups and for cluster-based units. Margin loan assistance, Critical amount finance, Margin money for start-ups, working capital requirements for the other types of enterprises. Every enterprise is digitised for its operations under our direction and support. It is for the units and banks to take advantage of our presence. Rates of interest range between 9 and 10 percent.

 TIHCL is keen on ensuring sustainability of enterprises through timely counselling, mentoring and advisory services on a continuing basis and this is our USP.

(This is the text of my address at the MSME Summit held by the CII-Hyderabad on the 7th November, 2020)

 

Monetary Policy Statement 6 August 2020

 

Some Healthy Deviation and Unfulfilled Expectations

The twin objectives of Monetary Policy – Containing Inflation and Promoting Growth – have largely been addressed in the latest Monetary Policy Statement of the Governor released on the 6^th August, 2020. Economy continues to face unprecedented stress in the backdrop of unabated pandemic. Inflation of 6.1% is +2% over the inflation target of RBI.

RBI says that inflation objective is further obscured by (a) the spike in food prices because of flood ravage in the north and north-east and ongoing lock down related disruptions; and (b) cost-push pressures in the form of high taxes on petroleum products, hikes in telecom charges, rising raw material costs. These factors led the Monetary Policy Committee to hold to the existing policy rates undisturbed.

Fitch and other rating institutions say that global growth tumbles in the face of pandemic growing uncertainty. ‘All manufacturing sectors remained in the negative territory excepting pharmaceutical sector. Manufacturing PMI remained in contraction at 34.2. Rural demand increase is the only silver line in the economy. Services sector indices show modest resumption of the economy. Yet tourism and aviation, passenger traffic in trains and buses do not show any signs of recovery. There is broad realization that monetary policy should drive credit in sectors that need most and the Banking sector requires more attention.

Liquidity pumped into the banking sector is of the order of Rs.9.57trillion or 4.7% of GDP with no show of risk appetite among banks. This has only assured the Depositors that the money is safe with banks and there is no need for hurried withdrawals for consumption needs.

CREDIT POLICY

The main driver of the consumption, credit activity of banks is mooted. Lot has been expected from the RBI on the credit policy front. Let me first deal with the best things first: Priority sector lending guidelines have been revised reducing regional disparities in the flow of credit and broadening the scope of priority sector to include credit to the Start-ups in the areas of renewable energy, including solar power and biogas compression plants; and, increasing the targets for lending to ‘small and marginal farmers and weaker sections.’ Incentives for lending to these sectors is related to credit flow to the lagging districts and assigning lower weight to incremental credit to priority sectors in districts where comparatively higher flow of credit had already taken place.

MSME Sector:

RBI Bulletin July 2020 indicates that during the current financial year so far, year-on-year growth is -7.6% for manufacturing MSEs and -5.4% for medium enterprises.

MSME Pulse Report indicates covid vulnerability high among 63 percent of the MSMs. Only 31 percent are strongly positioned to come back. It is these that will be pepped up by Banks and not the vulnerable even if they are standard assets. The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic will impact the profitability of MSMEs due to the declining market demand and rising operating costs in the new way of working.

Number of Studies, notably, ITC, Skoch Foundation, RGICS, CII, FICCI etc reveal that 59-74 percent of the MSMEs are highly risky and would be on the brink of closure if cash inflows do not support them upfront. GoI took the stand that they will be supported by Credit while those that are weak will be supported by sub-ordinated debt or Equity. This Equity product is yet to roll out from the government although Rs,20000cr guarantee backed fund is allocated in the package.

The Policy nowhere referred to the credit-driven Covid-19 Atma Nirbhar Abhiyan packages. Package one related to the standard assets at 20% additional working capital under Automatic Emergency Credit Relief Guarantee from National Credit Guarantee Trust. Against the Rs.3trn target under this window for standard asset ( Units that are performing or continuing their manufacturing activity) to be achieved by the end of September 2020, Banks have so far sanctioned around Rs.1.6trn of which 60% is disbursed. There are field reports that Banks are seeking to extend the existing collateral and/or guarantee to the additional working capital. The disadvantage for the borrowers is on two counts: one fresh documentation involving stamp duty of Rs.1000 and 2) their existing collateral will get extended for the additional working capital and this is quite contrary to the intentions of the scheme.

The second scheme, involving stressed assets under the category of Special Mention Accounts-2. The broad guidelines released are:

¡  Account shall be -

Ø  Standard as on 31.03.2018

Ø  In regular operations during 2018-19/2019-20

Ø  SMA2 later or NPA as on 30.04.2020 , and;

¡  Commercially viable enterprises post revival

¡  7-yr moratorium for principal amount of subordinated debt/equity

¡  Interest payable every month

¡  Subordinated Debt amount up to 15% of Debt O/s or Rs.75 lakh, whichever is lower will be given as personal loan to the promoter for a 10-year tenure. This amount should not be used for recovery of NPA. Entrepreneur can use this to meet his cash deficit, for meeting the payments to labour and making the unit covid-19 compliant.

¡  Unit should revive in 5 years –RBI Guidelines of March 17, 2016.

¡  Unit should be on growth path for 10 years

¡  Scheme Valid till 30^th September 2020.

Banks have not rolled out this package so far. RBI Master Circular of 2016 on Revival and Restructuring (RBI/16-17/338 dated March 17, 2016) stipulates: 1. Corrective Action Plan; 2. Revival and Restructuring of all viable manufacturing enterprises and 3. Recovery of the unviable through legal means. Banks have not implemented most of these instructions, save rare exceptions. Under the Subordinate Debt scheme, the enterprise should be first viable; it should be currently running whatever be the capacity utilization, and then, it should be restructured to see it as a standard asset in a year’s time and additional revival package and sovereign obligations if any to be recovered fully before the five year period concludes. Initial moratorium for the revival package would depend upon the viability arrived at. District Committees had to be formed and they should decide on the viability.

For all such units with outstanding liability of Rs.10lakhs and below, the Branch Manager is the deciding authority for reviving the unit while for the units over and above this limit, appropriate authority as decided by the Bank will take the call and place it before the District Committee. Though several Banks committed to the RBI that all such District Committees were set up even by December 2017, most of them are dysfunctional.

Under these circumstances, RBI announcing MSME revival and restructuring of enterprises falling under the category of GST-registered Standard Assets as on 1.3.2020 before 31^st March 2021 looks ambivalent.

The virtuous thing about the current instruction is that the asset classification as standard may be retained as such, whereas the accounts that may have slipped into NPA category between March2, 2020 and date of implementation may be upgraded as ‘Standard asset’ from such date of implementation. Banks are expected to maintain additional provisioning of 5% over and above the provision already held by them for such assets.

RBI should have allowed such forbearance for all the assets revived under the Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan -2 (Equity-driven revival). While Banks are aware that such any additional loan consequent to revision will be treated as standard asset, their reluctance to revive the viable enterprises is absolute risk aversion.

The only saving grace is that sale of securities to the ARC will now attract higher provisioning. This should trigger the thought that by reviving the asset instead of sale to ARC they would gain in provisioning as the asset is likely to be standard asset at the end of one year of revival. 

Monetary Policy viewed from the MSME perspective, is like what GoI proposes, RBI disposes. Apathy towards MSMEs still continues.  It is suggested that the RBI and GoI be on the same page in so far as MSME revival is concerned and second, shorten the period of decision making to just two weeks as against 55 days’ process indicated in the Master Circular of 2016 referred above.

Government of Telangana seems to be taking the lead in the revival of MSMEs. Telangana Industrial Health Clinic Ltd., set up by it, has put on its website, the Learning Tool for Revival and a Revival Pre-pack online for the enterprises to log in and post the details for quickly deciding on the prospects of viability.

Retail Loans:

As regards personal loans, RBI recognising that these loans falling under Retail Loan portfolio will be the next NPA balloon that will blow off, has accommodated the Banks through a resolution plan. It has been the practice of several Banks both in the Public and Private sector as also a few NBFCs to grant the personal loans wherever the related corporate accounts are held by them. Because of slow growth and the pandemic, several have lost their jobs and personal loan segment has come under severe pressure. RBI left it to the wisdom of Banks concerned to invoke the resolution plan by December 31, 2020 and shall be implemented within 90 days thereafter. There will be no requirement of third party validation or Expert Committee, or by credit rating agencies. Board Approved Policy will be necessary, and the resolution plan shall not exceed two years. Banks will have big relief on this score.

This Monetary Policy recognized the economic environment as tough to recover in the immediate short term. At the same time, it failed to provide the real growth impulses in invigorating the MSMEs to the required degree and failed to generate the risk appetite among banks. It looks more worried about the capital of banks than credit to the required sectors at the required speed.

The views are personal. This is an invited article from Skoch Foundation.

 

 

 

Little Cheer for Bank Nationalization

INDIA NEEDS TO DO SOMETHING MORE…

CRISIS OR NO CRISIS

                                                                                   

The Day of Bank Nationalization in India passed off on Sunday. Smiles were kept years behind. None talk of village adoption scheme; no Chairman would go to a village these days to see how their rural branches are helping the farmers or the MSME is financed. No pride in ownership. No regret for bad governance.

But for a full page pull-out by the All India Bank Employees’ Association on the 20^th July, 2020, who remembers the Nationalization Day? Neither the employees, nor the disappointed customers that include even the Banks’ own pensioners, nor those seeking credit from them recall the Day. People are only alert on wearing masks and spiriting their palms before handling the currency received from outsiders. Everyone cries wolf on the ever-bulging non-performing assets. The only solid reform that we boast of is the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Job creation is hurt badly in the organized sector with near-65% of MSMEs shutting their windows in pandemic. Their markets are yet to revive.

Banks in UK, Iceland, and even the US resorted to the most criticized and least preferred route of nationalization of banks, when they confronted a crisis. The then OBAMA initiative that received positive response of stock markets since the announcement of Toxic Loan basket takeover under a joint Government-Private Fund, was however inadequate to retrofit the lost confidence in the financial system. 

The revival of ‘protectionist’ actions would seem to be asserting more in finance than in trade.  While the regulators of G-20 would be meeting at the shortly, global regulatory regime has serious limitations and they should be realigned with domestic regulations that have compulsive cultural characteristics. 

Events so far have proved beyond doubt that a global regulatory regime would not be able to provide appropriate solutions to the type of recession that had set in due to pandemic. No prediction as to when it would end. Annual Balance Sheets for 2020 are waiting for finalization in several institutions. Basel III may have introduced a modicum of discipline and uniformity in risk discipline among Banks globally. Several regulators sought more flexibility. It is important for India to realize its distinction in the emerging economic scenario and how necessary it is to turn the head on the screws.

At the commencement of Covid attack, India did well and even till now, we do not find people scrambling for food because farmer and rural India stood by the nation.  The biggest blunder of the system is more announcements than actions and imperfect monitoring and undependable statistics. All the rating agencies, IMF and World Bank kept the ratings low and estimated growth of 42% in 2021. Opening the economy with lot of courage has not been taken too kindly by Corona that has been surging every day crossing the 10lakh persons. India took the 4th rank in the world in Corona affected nations.

Second, we have the key sectors like Steel, Zinc, other Metals and Coal as also the transportation system largely in the public sector. We entered the Commodity markets and derivative markets in our anxiety to mix with the globe. WTO is almost nearing collapse with most countries choosing to adopt policies that secure their own nations and people, not caring so much for the global discipline. 

Third, there was no demand recession of the magnitude that the other countries in the globe faced.  Still the rural areas where still 65 percent of our population lives, drive the demand growth.  Having said that some facts that can be hardly ignored: there is a steep decline in job growth; steep declines have also set in the private sector trumped up by the global recession; the urban and metro retail chains took a severe beating; the real estate and housing boom that irrationally stepped up land values across the country took the first heat-stroke and with them, the dependent MSME sector that is seen as the engine of growth.

Fourth, Banks that lent heavily for the retail sector and real estate sector started facing the continuous decline in their performing assets.  They lost confidence in the resurgence of the demand and the productive capacities of the manufacturing sector.  Most public sector banks even, refused to go with the RBI to pump credit. 

Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan, the stimuli announced to combat Covid-19, injecting more than Rs.20lakh liquidity, still face risk aversion from the Banks. This high liquidity released only moved to the investments in treasury instruments and to quote Subba Rao, former Governor, gave confidence to depositors in the Banking system that their monies are safe with the Banks, notwithstanding PMC Bank resolution still waiting at the doors of the RBI. It has two windows: one, investments and the other credit. The latest report on Investments not withstanding the $10mn investment announced by Google, all the investment projects are reported to be lagging behind and the cost over-run of the projects already swallowed the entire incentive package.

MSMEs are yet to come out of the two shocks of demonetization and GST. After the redefinition, and after a host of digital platforms placed within their reach, the access to credit by all counts is a poor show. Out of the National Credit Guarantee Trust linked credit incentive to the standard assets, Banks disbursed only 50% or less. This was supposed to be automatic release of 20% additional working capital. The second window to the stressed assets through Sub-ordinated debt is yet to open as the operating instructions were received only a few weeks back.

SIZE – AN IRRATIONAL CONCERN

Merger of PSBs taken up while the economy was slowing down is yet to show up the results. The market value of the SBI post-merger is way behind its peer, HDFC in the private sector. Sanctioning Rs.1200cr to a known defaulter in its books and erstwhile chronic NPA resolving through IBC, does not hold SBI in any high esteem either among global peers or its own clients. Government of India, by merging PSBs to 10 from 28 did not gain either in image or confidence of the people. Several clients say that corruption has become endemic in PSBs and not even acknowledging a complaint, or a letter of customer is so habitual that the latter are in the lurch.

While the Government’s efforts to digitize the delivery system have borne fruits reasonably going by the way the MNREG wages and other direct benefits reached the intended groups during the last two years, financial inclusion is way behind. The reach of banks to the poor has declined.

Regulator’s job is to make sure that the vertical and horizontal growth of institutions should not be allowed to go with a feeling that because of their size they are insulated from collapse and that the Government and regulator had to do something to keep them afloat even in the worst event like bankruptcy.  This is where the RBI should reformulate its views and ensure that the organizational structures irrespective of their affiliations do not overboard the governance and do not oversize.

The silos-based regulatory system currently in vogue, with the RBI regulating Banks and NBFCs, Stock Markets by the SEBI, Pensions by the Pension Fund Regulatory Development Authority, Insurance by the Insurance Regulatory Development Authority, and Commodity Futures by the Futures Market Commission should be effectively brought under Financial Services Regulatory Authority. Department of Financial Services, Union Ministry of Finance may have persons of eminence but when it comes to examining micro issues for macro management, it left lot to deliver. Collective wisdom needs to emerge to improve financial regulation and governance that affects 130bn people does not brook delay.  

India, for example does not have credit risk insurance of the order prevailing in either Italy, or Germany or South Africa.  The Credit Guarantee Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises is but a poor cousin of the trade and credit risk. Credit Risk could not be introduced in India as the IRDA was apprehensive of the consequences of credit default.  It is perhaps of the opinion that the moral turpitude would reach new dimensions if credit risk is introduced. 

Percy Mistry Committee called for a unified regulatory architecture for resolving issues dealing with segmentation of financial markets into banking, capital markets, insurance, pensions, derivatives etc. Sweden, Singapore, UAE, UK, Republic of Korea to cite a few have already moved into the unified regulatory system.

OPERATIONAL ISSSUES:

Warren Buffet, the most reputed investor, is quoted at number of places: “Derivatives were financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal.” Over-the-counter derivatives that are off-balance sheet instruments come to surface suddenly when their collaterals fall and when their values become riskier to hold, killing in one stroke rest of the healthy assets of the Banks. The delivery and recipient systems have not reached a level of maturity to play with them, even a decade after their active entry.  Indian financial system cannot afford the consequences of systemic risks arising from their instrumentality.

Let me go to the most familiar area – Credit Risk that is mostly understood as risk of default.  Here the risks arising from asymmetric information have not been dealt with. The Credit Information Bureau India Ltd.,(CIBIL) is the only institution that currently unfolds client’s historic information at  price.  Entry of multiple players with the enactment of Credit Information Services Act of 2005 is put on hold.  Trade and Credit information services should enter the competitive domain for the information system to get into a semblance of order.

Credit rating agencies in India that are approved by the RBI are none other than the Fitch, Standard and Poor, Moodys etc., whose ratings busted on the threshold of sub-prime crisis and beyond.  There is no proof that they are doing their job differently.  Until the rating agencies’ services are paid for by the financing institutions that make use of the ratings and hold them accountable for the ratings, there is no guarantee that the ratings per se would add to the quality of the credit portfolio the banks carry in respect of the rated assets. 

While the Government and the RBI, Insurance and Capital Market regulatory authorities have proved one-upmanship over the other regulatory authorities in reasonably insulating the Indian Financial System from the impacts of the current global crisis, a large gap remains in what is needed to be done. The time to put things in the right shape is now and right away.

It is high time to appoint a High-level Committee that should also include outside experts to clean up the banking system with an open mind.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------*The Author is an Economist with three decades of banking experience and a Risk Management Specialist He can be reached at yerramr@gmail.com The views are author’s own.

https://www.moneylife.in/article/ramping-up-the-banks-india-needs-to-do-something-more-crisis-or-no-crisis/60966.html

Cooperative Banks move to a single regulator

Cooperative Banks move to a single regulator - RBI

PMC Bank failure triggered the action on the part of Union Government to amend Banking Regulation Act 1949 bringing the Cooperative Banks in the direct regulatory ambit of the RBI, putting a full stop for dual regulation of the Cooperative Banking sector. The ordinance does not include Primary Cooperative Societies, the principal constituents of the State Cooperative Banks (StCB) District Cooperative Central Banks DCCBs). Urban Cooperative Banks and Multi State Cooperative Banks and the rest of Rural Cooperative Credit structure falling in the ambit of NABARD supervision will all be subject to such amended regulation.

The preamble of the Ordinance on Banking Regulation Act 1949 Amendment makes us understand that the cooperative banks are not well managed; not properly regulated; and the affairs conducted are detrimental to the interests of the depositors. They also lack professionalism, good governance and sound banking practices. The objective of the amendment is to correct all of them. It is important to view this ordinance in the backdrop of the latest Report on UCBs chaired by R.Gandhi, when he was Dy.Governor.

R.Gandhi (2015) Report says: “As UCBs form an important vehicle for financial inclusion and facilitate payment and settlement, it may be appropriate to support their growth and proliferation further in the background of the differentiated bank model. However, the question remains whether unrestrained growth can be allowed, keeping in view the restricted ability of UCBs to raise capital, lack of level playing field in regulation and supervision and absence of a resolution mechanism at par with commercial banks.” UCBs now have high aspirations of competing with commercial banks and they expect RBI to provide relaxations in various regulatory restrictions.

In countries like Canada, Cooperative Banks pose a formidable challenge to commercial banks and the former follow the capital regulations of Basel, conduct elections regularly, Associations of Cooperatives conduct induction courses and retreats for Board members on governance. Without harming the principles of cooperatives the Cooperative Banks pose a stiff competition to the commercial banks.

A study was conducted on behalf of Gandhi committee to ascertain the range of loans granted by scheduled and non-scheduled UCBs. The study shows diametrically opposite trends in the range of loans granted by the two types of co-operative banks. While the scheduled banks granted 59.6% of the total loans in the largest loan size ranges of Rs.1-5 crore and above Rs. 5 crore, non-scheduled banks catered to the small loan segments up to Rs.10 lakh in a substantial way as this segment constituted 59.5% of the loans granted by this component of UCBs. The study further supports the premise that large MS-UCBs have aligned their business models and goals with those of commercial banks while availing of the concessions granted to the sector. Even this study could not bring out the frauds and maleficence of Bank like PMC because the fraud has been traced to even earlier period.

“The Report says; major considerations to be kept in mind are the aspirations of large UCBs, conflicts of interest, decline in cooperativeness, regulatory arbitrage, limitations on raising capital, limited resolution powers of RBI, the capital structure of UCBs and opportunities for growth that will accrue after such conversions.” The UCBs are subject to annual inspections by the RBI. Yet it could not hold accountable for the large scale frauds in UCBs.

In so far as StCBs and DCCBs are concerned, they are under the supervision of NABARD and the Board appointments are supposed to be done as per the ‘fit and proper’ criteria fixed by RBI. Elections to the Cooperative Societies are conducted by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies. Cooperative Societies as per cooperative statute are member-driven, member-controlled and member-protected. If members who are large in numbers choose to abdicate their responsibilities or do not take enough interest in their activities, jeopardising the interests of other stakeholders and particularly the non-member depositors, the remedy rests only with the Registrar.  In so far as banking is concerned, it is only RBI that regulates all and all UCBs are subject to inspections by the RBI annually or whenever any aberration comes to their notice even during a year. Depositors’ constituency for long has been asking for a representation on the Board and this can be done only by amendment to the Cooperative Act.

The latest report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India from RBI (December 2019) has highlighted the importance of cooperative banks in India lies in their grassroots’ integration into the life and ethos of the widest sections of society and effective instruments of financial inclusion. They account for about near 10 percent of total assets of scheduled commercial banks in 2017-18. It also clarified that the combined balance sheet of UCBs witnessed robust expansion underscoring the effectiveness of measures taken to strengthen their financials.

Although 89.5% of the UCBs’ resource base happens to be Deposits, their growth is muted and remains well-below the average of 13.9 per cent achieved during 2007-08 to 2016-17.” A CAMELS (capital  adequacy;  asset quality; management; earnings; liquidity; and systems and control) rating model is used to classify UCBs for regulatory and supervisory purposes. UCBs in the top-ranking categories— with ratings A and B—accounted for 78 per cent of the sector. Only 4to 5 percent are in D category for the last five years. And yet, the well-rated UCBs have defalcated with immunity for years. Will this ordinance rectify this malady?

UCBs are under the regulation of RBI and Registrar of Cooperatives of the State Government where they were situated. The regulatory conflicts were being resolved through TAFCUB during the last ten years to the satisfaction of both banks and the regulators at the altar of RBI.

During the last two decades, Marathe Committee, Madhava Rao Committee, Malegam Committee, Gandhi Committee and RBI’ Vision of UCBs have gone on record on the measures to be taken for strengthening them in the face of a series of frauds and maleficence and even closure of several UCBs in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh etc.

GoI even brought out a comprehensive 97^th Amendment to the Constitution of India in 2011 as a Model Cooperative Act to be enacted by the State Governments. None except the Government of Orissa showed interest. Had this Act been passed and implemented in letter and spirit there would have been no need for the Ordinance now.

No State is keen on legal reforms to cooperatives. Cooperatives are the seedbed of politics and every prominent politician of the country, barring some Rajya Sabha or Legislative Council Members, everyone started his/her political career with Cooperative Society as the base. To borrow an acronym, cooperatives without politics is lame and politics without cooperatives is blind. Viewed from this perspective, this ordinance makes a great difference. It sets at naught all political interferences beyond the primary cooperative societies.

Several Commercial Banks, fully under the regulation of the RBI since 1949 have also been victims of frauds and maleficence. Several Banks, both in the public and private sector like SBI, ICICI, PNB etc continue to hit the headlines on such count.

The difference is that in all such cases, the interests of depositors have been protected. There were mergers or amalgamations but there were very few occasions where the affected Banks were closed or deposits barred from withdrawal. It should be worthy to recall that even in case of commercial banks the deposits are secured to the same extent as UCBs/MSCBs, viz., Rs.1lakh earlier and recently enhanced to the extent of Rs.5lakhs per depositor. 

Several UCBs are already part of the National Payments System. Financial inclusion demands customer centricity and smart technology applications apart from financial learning at the institutional and client level.

Rural Credit Cooperatives have been in the throes of change: accounting practices,  (from single entry book keeping to double entry book keeping), technology change; regulatory changes and structural changes. They have come into the mainstream of financial inclusion agenda of the country.

When NABARD has a new guard, it would have allowed scope to the new management to carry out the required improvements to the Short Term Cooperative Credit Structure instead of clubbing them with the UCBs. All the DCCBs have already been brought under the regulation of RBI notwithstanding the ordinance. Further, RBI invested in computerization of both the UCBs and Rural Coop Societies and banks with the allocation of Rs.4lakhs per UCB and maintenance cost of Rs.15000 per month for a period of 3 years post implementation. Government of India in their 2017-18 Budget allocated Rs.1900cr towards computerization of PACS. This initiative should have been properly monitored to ensure transparency, better accounting practices and better customer service on par with commercial banks. To search for a solution of lost opportunity in the ordinance does not reflect a good governance practice.

Though the organization may introduce appropriate strategies, it is the culture of the organization and governance that would require to be looked at in cooperatives. They can improve the bottom lines through reduced costs; enhance the customer experience; and strengthen security and compliance through state-of-the art encryption practices, audit trails and security certifications. Customers always need their data to be safe and secure.

When the problem rests with regulator – lax inspections, lack of transparency in dealing with the Banks and improving governance, the remedy is sought through a legislative amendment!!     This may perhaps provide a better lever to the RBI to  merge weak UCBs with strong ones and disable closures as a  solution to protect the interests of depositors. Will the PMC depositors now get fully all their deposits and interest?  We should wait and see.

Development of cooperatives is no longer an option, but a compelling necessity to achieve financial inclusion. Implementation of the Ordinance should only strengthen the cooperative system and not eliminate them in the guise of regulation.

https://www.moneylife.in/article/cooperative-banks-move-to-a-single-regulator-rbi-and-not-a-day-too-soon/60767.html