Showing posts with label Agriculture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Agriculture. Show all posts

Monday, May 30, 2022

Bright Future for Indian Agriculture But Reforms Imminent

 


Future is bright for Indian Agriculture – But Reforms Imminent.

B. Yerram Raju*

Agriculture is one sector that takes all the four factors of production – land, labour, capital, and organisation/management - in full measure, and consumes the scarcest resource water additionally. Several limitations surround the future of agriculture. Land is limited and there are several claims from dwellers to industrialists. So is water and capital. Management depends on the absorption of the latest technologies.

India has only 4 percent of world’s wate resources. Its present population of around 1.39bn is likely to escalate to 1.69bn according to population experts. Improving (a) water resources’ optimization, (b) productivity of the small holdings that constitute 50 percent of the arable land, (c) technologies unique to the production systems of India, (d) integrating all types of agricultural activities and (e) resilience to climate change, is imperative.

India’s agricultural growth (1950-2020) can be seen in many areas: the second largest horticultural production in the world; the highest milk production in the world, witnessing twelve-fold growth; the second largest fish production in the world. It is now a net exporter and its agricultural production is 44 percent higher than that of the US. According to Praveen Rao, Vice Chancellor, PJTS Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India’s agricultural GDP rose from US$ 15bn in 1960 to US$101bn in 2000. During the next sixteen years, the growth was 350 percent more than that registered during the preceding thirty years.    

A.K. Singh, Director, Indian Agricultural Research Institute of ICAR, in his most recent J. Raghotham Reddy memorial lecture at Hyderabad, highlighted that despite 32.7 percent increase in the area during 1951-2021, the production increased by almost six times, and productivity increased by 4.5 times during the same period, maintaining the food security. The period did not saw pestilence and famines in the country. Market-assisted Selection (MAS) is now an integral part of the cultivar development programmes at the ICAR institutions and several agricultural universities, developing 74 crop cultivars in seven different crops -rice, wheat, pearl millet, chickpea, soybean, groundnut, and maize. This still leaves the challenge of India producing 333mt of food grains to feed its projected 1.64bn population by 2050.

As per the NSSO (2014), about 232 million persons are employed still in agriculture (49 per cent of the workforce), contributing about 17 per cent of the GDP. The number seems to have come down to about 219 million in 2015, which is still a very significant number (Kapoor, 2017). A NITI Aayog study estimated the agricultural labour productivity is one-third of the non-agricultural sectors. There is severe shortage of farm labour either to cut the sugarcane crop or cotton picking – the two largest labour-absorbing crops.

Telangana State is the first state to commence growing single-pick cotton from this year, thanks to the intense research by the PJTSAU under the specific directive of the farmer-Chief Minister, K. Chandrasekhar Rao. Farmers are eagerly looking for assured yields of this variety to save the labour costs.

Farming has been the focus and not the farmer of all the research that no doubt yielded excellent results. Doubling of farmers’ income by 2025 is still a dream, because reforms in agriculture sector were just ignored for the last three decades. Small farmer and tenant farmers realised that they have to turn as entrepreneurs for sustainable growth. Several start-ups in farm field have lately come up. Still, aggregators at the farm gate, marketing reforms and easy access to credit beg attention of the policy maker, more so, when we look at the technological innovations that A. K. Singh spoke off:  1. Molecular breeding, 2. Crop biofortification, 3. Microbial technologies, 4. Climate change and mitigation strategies, 5. Satellite remote-sensing technology, 6. Precision agriculture, and 7. Improving irrigation efficiency.

In addition to speed breeding, genome breeding, and use of remote sensing techniques, drone technology for smart agriculture is making deep inroads. A. Drone Sensing for mapping and discrimination of crops, monitoring crop stress – biotic and abiotic, yield damage assessment, soil fertility, and for agri-input applications are some of the drone-based technologies.

While it is true that a century beyond will see the disruptive technologies shaping agriculture growth, the way forward would be in investing in human resources and infrastructure for disruptive innovations (at least 1.4 percent of GDP in agriculture), like Internet of technologies (IoT), AI, ML, Block Chain leading climate, smart, regenerative and remunerative agriculture, adoption of management practices integrating small farm holdings, and mainstreaming the biofortified crops and nutrition literacy.

Investment should come either from the farmer’s equity or his ability to raise the debt. Debt markets in India are deeply suspicious of the farmer and small entrepreneur. Therefore, there is need for a cultural shift in lending to the farm sector. Second, all the above technologies still carry the risk of adverse weather and climate. They are also subject to the cyclones, tsunamis, floods, and holocausts. While crop related technologies are of short term nature, rest are all medium to long term capital investments. Agri-entrepreneurs should look to investments from angel funds, patient capital investors and social capital entrepreneurs. Green House Gas reduction from the climate-resilient agricultural practices have the potential to earn carbon credits (CC) up to 5CC/ha and 1 carbon credit is equal to US$37. 15000 hectares have this potential, according to A. K. Singh.

Further, integrated farming on small farm holdings – crop, horticulture, household dairy, backyard poultry, small pond-culture, and home-grown ducks – will cross-hold risks and pave the way for farmer doubling his income erelong. Sustainability of agricultural growth is assured thus through heavy capital investments in climate resistant technologies, cashing in carbon credits sooner than later, change in the mind-set of lenders and farmers to accelerate lending, and appropriate insurance mechanisms that are farmer-friendly.

*This article is based largely on a couple of lectures: 1. V. Praveen Rao, at the Fifth International Agronomy Congress and A.K. Singh, at the Farm and Rural Science Foundation’s J. Raghotham Reddy Memorial Lecture. The views expressed are mine.

Future is bright for Indian Agriculture – But Reforms Imminent.

B. Yerram Raju*

Agriculture is one sector that takes all the four factors of production – land, labour, capital, and organisation/management - in full measure, and consumes the scarcest resource water additionally. Several limitations surround the future of agriculture. Land is limited and there are several claims from dwellers to industrialists. So is water and capital. Management depends on the absorption of the latest technologies.

India has only 4 percent of world’s wate resources. Its present population of around 1.39bn is likely to escalate to 1.69bn according to population experts. Improving (a) water resources’ optimization, (b) productivity of the small holdings that constitute 50 percent of the arable land, (c) technologies unique to the production systems of India, (d) integrating all types of agricultural activities and (e) resilience to climate change, is imperative.

India’s agricultural growth (1950-2020) can be seen in many areas: the second largest horticultural production in the world; the highest milk production in the world, witnessing twelve-fold growth; the second largest fish production in the world. It is now a net exporter and its agricultural production is 44 percent higher than that of the US. According to Praveen Rao, Vice Chancellor, PJTS Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India’s agricultural GDP rose from US$ 15bn in 1960 to US$101bn in 2000. During the next sixteen years, the growth was 350 percent more than that registered during the preceding thirty years.    

A.K. Singh, Director, Indian Agricultural Research Institute of ICAR, in his most recent J. Raghotham Reddy memorial lecture at Hyderabad, highlighted that despite 32.7 percent increase in the area during 1951-2021, the production increased by almost six times, and productivity increased by 4.5 times during the same period, maintaining the food security. The period did not saw pestilence and famines in the country. Market-assisted Selection (MAS) is now an integral part of the cultivar development programmes at the ICAR institutions and several agricultural universities, developing 74 crop cultivars in seven different crops -rice, wheat, pearl millet, chickpea, soybean, groundnut, and maize. This still leaves the challenge of India producing 333mt of food grains to feed its projected 1.64bn population by 2050.

As per the NSSO (2014), about 232 million persons are employed still in agriculture (49 per cent of the workforce), contributing about 17 per cent of the GDP. The number seems to have come down to about 219 million in 2015, which is still a very significant number (Kapoor, 2017). A NITI Aayog study estimated the agricultural labour productivity is one-third of the non-agricultural sectors. There is severe shortage of farm labour either to cut the sugarcane crop or cotton picking – the two largest labour-absorbing crops.

Telangana State is the first state to commence growing single-pick cotton from this year, thanks to the intense research by the PJTSAU under the specific directive of the farmer-Chief Minister, K. Chandrasekhar Rao. Farmers are eagerly looking for assured yields of this variety to save the labour costs.

Farming has been the focus and not the farmer of all the research that no doubt yielded excellent results. Doubling of farmers’ income by 2025 is still a dream, because reforms in agriculture sector were just ignored for the last three decades. Small farmer and tenant farmers realised that they have to turn as entrepreneurs for sustainable growth. Several start-ups in farm field have lately come up. Still, aggregators at the farm gate, marketing reforms and easy access to credit beg attention of the policy maker, more so, when we look at the technological innovations that A. K. Singh spoke off:  1. Molecular breeding, 2. Crop biofortification, 3. Microbial technologies, 4. Climate change and mitigation strategies, 5. Satellite remote-sensing technology, 6. Precision agriculture, and 7. Improving irrigation efficiency.

In addition to speed breeding, genome breeding, and use of remote sensing techniques, drone technology for smart agriculture is making deep inroads. A. Drone Sensing for mapping and discrimination of crops, monitoring crop stress – biotic and abiotic, yield damage assessment, soil fertility, and for agri-input applications are some of the drone-based technologies.

While it is true that a century beyond will see the disruptive technologies shaping agriculture growth, the way forward would be in investing in human resources and infrastructure for disruptive innovations (at least 1.4 percent of GDP in agriculture), like Internet of technologies (IoT), AI, ML, Block Chain leading climate, smart, regenerative and remunerative agriculture, adoption of management practices integrating small farm holdings, and mainstreaming the biofortified crops and nutrition literacy.

Investment should come either from the farmer’s equity or his ability to raise the debt. Debt markets in India are deeply suspicious of the farmer and small entrepreneur. Therefore, there is need for a cultural shift in lending to the farm sector. Second, all the above technologies still carry the risk of adverse weather and climate. They are also subject to the cyclones, tsunamis, floods, and holocausts. While crop related technologies are of short term nature, rest are all medium to long term capital investments. Agri-entrepreneurs should look to investments from angel funds, patient capital investors and social capital entrepreneurs. Green House Gas reduction from the climate-resilient agricultural practices have the potential to earn carbon credits (CC) up to 5CC/ha and 1 carbon credit is equal to US$37. 15000 hectares have this potential, according to A. K. Singh.

Further, integrated farming on small farm holdings – crop, horticulture, household dairy, backyard poultry, small pond-culture, and home-grown ducks – will cross-hold risks and pave the way for farmer doubling his income erelong. Sustainability of agricultural growth is assured thus through heavy capital investments in climate resistant technologies, cashing in carbon credits sooner than later, change in the mind-set of lenders and farmers to accelerate lending, and appropriate insurance mechanisms that are farmer-friendly.

*This article is based largely on a couple of lectures: 1. V. Praveen Rao, at the Fifth International Agronomy Congress and A.K. Singh, at the Farm and Rural Science Foundation’s J. Raghotham Reddy Memorial Lecture. The views expressed are mine.

 

 Future is bright for Indian Agriculture – But Reforms Imminent.

B. Yerram Raju*

Agriculture is one sector that takes all the four factors of production – land, labour, capital, and organisation/management - in full measure, and consumes the scarcest resource water additionally. Several limitations surround the future of agriculture. Land is limited and there are several claims from dwellers to industrialists. So is water and capital. Management depends on the absorption of the latest technologies.

India has only 4 percent of world’s wate resources. Its present population of around 1.39bn is likely to escalate to 1.69bn according to population experts. Improving (a) water resources’ optimization, (b) productivity of the small holdings that constitute 50 percent of the arable land, (c) technologies unique to the production systems of India, (d) integrating all types of agricultural activities and (e) resilience to climate change, is imperative.

India’s agricultural growth (1950-2020) can be seen in many areas: the second largest horticultural production in the world; the highest milk production in the world, witnessing twelve-fold growth; the second largest fish production in the world. It is now a net exporter and its agricultural production is 44 percent higher than that of the US. According to Praveen Rao, Vice Chancellor, PJTS Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India’s agricultural GDP rose from US$ 15bn in 1960 to US$101bn in 2000. During the next sixteen years, the growth was 350 percent more than that registered during the preceding thirty years.    

A.K. Singh, Director, Indian Agricultural Research Institute of ICAR, in his most recent J. Raghotham Reddy memorial lecture at Hyderabad, highlighted that despite 32.7 percent increase in the area during 1951-2021, the production increased by almost six times, and productivity increased by 4.5 times during the same period, maintaining the food security. The period did not saw pestilence and famines in the country. Market-assisted Selection (MAS) is now an integral part of the cultivar development programmes at the ICAR institutions and several agricultural universities, developing 74 crop cultivars in seven different crops -rice, wheat, pearl millet, chickpea, soybean, groundnut, and maize. This still leaves the challenge of India producing 333mt of food grains to feed its projected 1.64bn population by 2050.

As per the NSSO (2014), about 232 million persons are employed still in agriculture (49 per cent of the workforce), contributing about 17 per cent of the GDP. The number seems to have come down to about 219 million in 2015, which is still a very significant number (Kapoor, 2017). A NITI Aayog study estimated the agricultural labour productivity is one-third of the non-agricultural sectors. There is severe shortage of farm labour either to cut the sugarcane crop or cotton picking – the two largest labour-absorbing crops.

Telangana State is the first state to commence growing single-pick cotton from this year, thanks to the intense research by the PJTSAU under the specific directive of the farmer-Chief Minister, K. Chandrasekhar Rao. Farmers are eagerly looking for assured yields of this variety to save the labour costs.

Farming has been the focus and not the farmer of all the research that no doubt yielded excellent results. Doubling of farmers’ income by 2025 is still a dream, because reforms in agriculture sector were just ignored for the last three decades. Small farmer and tenant farmers realised that they have to turn as entrepreneurs for sustainable growth. Several start-ups in farm field have lately come up. Still, aggregators at the farm gate, marketing reforms and easy access to credit beg attention of the policy maker, more so, when we look at the technological innovations that A. K. Singh spoke off:  1. Molecular breeding, 2. Crop biofortification, 3. Microbial technologies, 4. Climate change and mitigation strategies, 5. Satellite remote-sensing technology, 6. Precision agriculture, and 7. Improving irrigation efficiency.

In addition to speed breeding, genome breeding, and use of remote sensing techniques, drone technology for smart agriculture is making deep inroads. A. Drone Sensing for mapping and discrimination of crops, monitoring crop stress – biotic and abiotic, yield damage assessment, soil fertility, and for agri-input applications are some of the drone-based technologies.

While it is true that a century beyond will see the disruptive technologies shaping agriculture growth, the way forward would be in investing in human resources and infrastructure for disruptive innovations (at least 1.4 percent of GDP in agriculture), like Internet of technologies (IoT), AI, ML, Block Chain leading climate, smart, regenerative and remunerative agriculture, adoption of management practices integrating small farm holdings, and mainstreaming the biofortified crops and nutrition literacy.

Investment should come either from the farmer’s equity or his ability to raise the debt. Debt markets in India are deeply suspicious of the farmer and small entrepreneur. Therefore, there is need for a cultural shift in lending to the farm sector. Second, all the above technologies still carry the risk of adverse weather and climate. They are also subject to the cyclones, tsunamis, floods, and holocausts. While crop related technologies are of short term nature, rest are all medium to long term capital investments. Agri-entrepreneurs should look to investments from angel funds, patient capital investors and social capital entrepreneurs. Green House Gas reduction from the climate-resilient agricultural practices have the potential to earn carbon credits (CC) up to 5CC/ha and 1 carbon credit is equal to US$37. 15000 hectares have this potential, according to A. K. Singh.

Further, integrated farming on small farm holdings – crop, horticulture, household dairy, backyard poultry, small pond-culture, and home-grown ducks – will cross-hold risks and pave the way for farmer doubling his income erelong. Sustainability of agricultural growth is assured thus through heavy capital investments in climate resistant technologies, cashing in carbon credits sooner than later, change in the mind-set of lenders and farmers to accelerate lending, and appropriate insurance mechanisms that are farmer-friendly.

*This article is based largely on a couple of lectures: 1. V. Praveen Rao, at the Fifth International Agronomy Congress and A.K. Singh, at the Farm and Rural Science Foundation’s J. Raghotham Reddy Memorial Lecture. The views expressed are mine.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/fincorp/future-is-bright-for-indian-agriculture-but-reforms-imminent/

 

 

 

 

Sunday, February 6, 2022

Disappointing Union Budget 2023

 

Bluster Budget

BYTELANGANA TODAY

B. Yerram Raju

PUBLISHED: 6TH FEB 2022 12:02 AM | UPDATED: 5TH FEB 2022 10:27 PM


Budget leaves these ladies in search of viable options

Usually, the Economic Survey presented a day before the Union Budget is expected to lay the foundation for a policy direction. It acknowledges the challenging times for policymaking – this time against the backdrop of the pandemic impact, especially on the vulnerable sections, fall in consumption in the medium term and serious supply-side disruptions. There are some half-truths as well when it said that government expenditure has pushed consumption by 7% in 2021-22. Even credit flow was tepid till the end of the second quarter of this fiscal.

The Union government’s debt crossed 59.3% of GDP from 49.1% a year ago. Recovery of the economy is unlikely to contain fiscal deficit as the major item of investment is through public debt and less through tax revenue. The Finance Minister’s Budget speech has little substance to combat either inflation or inclusivity. It also seemed to ignore several suggestions from the pre-Budget meetings.

Roads, highways, and railways are dependent on States for making available the land but the States have not been taken into confidence and several State-led projects were not supported by the Union government

The Budget has laid, of course, a foundation for large investments in infrastructure to flow under public-private partnership. But roads, highways and railways are dependent on States for making available the land, and the States have not been taken into confidence. Several State-led projects were not supported by the Union government during the year. The same is the case with the integration of rivers —Godavari, Krishna and Cauvery.

Missing Mentions

The Budget disappoints on inclusive development and climate change. Waste management has no incentive and de-carbonisation too was little talked about. Infrastructure development leads only to temporary employment and in the context of migratory unemployment that saw people dying on railway platforms and highways, literally starving during the first Covid-19 lockdown, and their returning to work, there are no clues. Inflation is least talked about.

The increase in GST (Goods and Services Tax) on which there was wide applause is more on account of inflation than due to the increase in productivity going by the drop in IIP. There was no mention of the revival of manufacturing NPAs in Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan though the extension of the guarantee mechanism under CGTMSE (Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises) modification and Sovereign Bond replacing the guarantee for tender participation in public sector markets are most welcome for MSMEs. It is the medium enterprises that got the best of the bargain. The agriculture sector received an apologetic approach — a rise in MSP for wheat and rice accompanied by a fall in subsidy for fertilizers by Rs 35,000 crore.

Gujarat is Nation!

No wonder the Chief Minister of Telangana in a deservedly hard-hitting address, highlighted the thinking and approach of the Union government on several issues, and particularly, those relating to Telangana. For eight years, ie, since the inception of the State, Rs 42,000 crore is all that was given under Central schemes. This is far below the disbursements made by the State under the Rythu Bandhu scheme alone. Jal Shakti, the much-touted scheme of the Union government, had an allocation of just Rs 60,000 crore while Telangana spent Rs 40,000 crore on Mission Kakatiya and Mission Bhagiratha. The country holds 65,000 TMC of water with just around 35,000 TMC utilised. The water policy of the nation is in a shambles.

When the International Arbitration Centre was officially launched at Hyderabad and the State government has allotted enough space for it, it is strange that the Budget announced it as a gift to the GIFT city of Gujarat!

Uniform GST rate for toys, a policy framework for the toy industry and targeting at least 1% of the market share from China would mean a Rs 10,000-crore opportunity for the MSEs. The Budget has done little

Bihar Special Package, Gujarat Bullet Train, Karnataka Metro, Bundelkhand Defence Corridor had space but nothing for Telangana. Gujarat is the only State that received a mention in the allocations to the States as if Gujarat alone represents the nation!!

Further, the Budget should usually consider a few recommendations of statutory bodies like the Finance Commissions and the NITI Aayog. This Budget quietly slipped the recommended allocations to Telangana both under the 14th and 15th Finance Commissions depriving the legitimate share of the State in the Union Budget.

Even under the AP State Reorganization Act, 2013, allocations for important projects like IIM, IIT, IT corridor, Warangal-Hyderabad industrial corridor are forgotten despite repeated representations from the State. This squint-eyed approach of the Union government makes one wonder whether we are under a federal democracy or a unitary rule. This is the reason for K Chandrashekhar Rao calling for rewriting the Indian Constitution, which has seen more than 120 amendments.

The International Arbitration Centre was officially launched at Hyderabad but it is strange that the Budget announced it as a gift to the GIFT city of Gujarat!

Devils that lie in details

Legitimising Crypto

The Budget legitimised the illegal cryptocurrency that has the potential for killing the monetary stability of the large population by taxing 30% of those assets. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said a “digital rupee using blockchain and other technologies” will be issued by the Reserve Bank of India in 2022-23. “It will also lead to a more efficient and cheaper currency management system.”

The RBI coming up with digital currency would add fuel to the fire, as it may help only the fintechs. This could lead to financial instability in the days to come. Digital literacy is at a 32% level and general literacy at more than 45%. There is a cyber-fraud every day draining the hard-earned savings of lakhs of persons hurting their livelihoods as well.

NEP Neglected

There has been no increase in the allocation for the education sector. The National Education Policy demands at least 4-5% of allocation for the education sector but it ended up with less than 2%. The pandemic led to several uncertainties in education — a mix of institutional and digital education — and the complicity of some digital institutions awarding MBA degree that has been rightly discredited by the AICTE.

Poor Health

The health sector, despite all encomiums in her speech for the remarkable speed and efficiency in delivery of vaccines and improvements in health infrastructure during the year, did not receive even 6% allocation.

Uncertain Jobs

Employment had a serious setback due to the pandemic. Employment expectations on account of infrastructure projects under the PPP model will be project-driven and not stability and security for the persons employed. Fifty lakh persons to be employed in such projects and services sector would be a mythical figure. The Budget is hollow here.

Takers for Tourism

Tourism and hospitality sectors received a big-ticket. But all of it would depend on the people’s confidence in safe travel and safe food. Supply chains for this sector are in serious problems. The allocations would give a psychological boost for the sectors and would not materially alter their fortunes at least for six months after the Omicron settles down without any further variants hitting the economies around the globe.

Globally, commodity markets indicate a slump and have all portends of inflation.

Budget quietly slips the recommended allocations to Telangana both under the 14th and 15th Finance Commissions depriving the legitimate share of the State in the Union Budget

MSME Sector

The MSME Sector has some things to cheer about but much to mourn. Extension of ECLGS (Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme) till March 2023 is welcome but they expect that the banks should extend the facilities to the most beleaguered micro and small manufacturing enterprises. Rs 6,000 crore over the next five years for a rating tool for the sector creates more fears as 98% of enterprises are proprietary and partnerships (family concerns).

The organic databases of G to C, B to B, and B to C would perform as portals with interlinkage of Udhyam, e-Shram, National Career Service (NCS) and Aatamanirbhar Skilled Employee Employer Mapping (ASEEM) portals, giving data a big push. There is no indication whether data itself would provide security instead of collaterals or guarantees sought by banks. The proposal to initiate a completely paperless, end-to-end online e-Bill System in all central ministries will greatly help MSME suppliers as it is to reduce delays in payments and make the process transparent. It is, however, doubtful whether this step would boost skilling, re-skilling, up-skilling and promote new enterprises because of the present levels of digitisation of the MSEs.

Micro and small manufacturers or service providers are sub-contractors and the FM’s announcement of substituting guarantees demanded by the governments and PSUs by a surety bond at the hands of insurance companies could be saving the working capital gap. It is important to see the fine print here and that the subcontractors get their due share.

A fund with blended capital raised under co-investment model facilitated through Nabard to finance startups in agriculture and rural enterprises for farm produce value chain is proposed. Startups will be promoted for Drone Shakti. It will be the large among the SMEs that may take advantage of this scheme. It also depends upon the way the co-investment model is structured by Nabard.

We have not seen much traction of PE/VC investments in manufacturing MSEs and hope that the Expert Committee proposed would provide sufficient comfort for the sector’s access to these funds. Extension of tax redemption by one more year for startups beyond the existing three years would help many service sector enterprises.

Micro and small manufacturing enterprises were the worst hit during the pandemic and many have not been able to revive. While speaking about Atma Nirbhar Bharat Abhiyan, the FM chose to ignore the failure of the subordinate debt scheme meant to revive the NPAs as all banks have woven a wet cloth around it. The manufacturing sector, due to severe supply chain disruptions, has grown only by a modest 1.3% (IIP).

MSEs have sought the lowest cost of capital of which, there was no mention in the Budget. Uniform GST rate for toys, a policy framework for the toy industry and targeting at least one per cent of the market share from China would mean a Rs 10,000 crore opportunity for the MSEs. The sector has been demanding cash-flow-based working capital assessment from the banks as recommended by UK Sinha Committee on which there was no word.

The Budget has done little for pushing consumer demand, particularly in the context of McKinsey estimate of a fall in the retail grocery market by 20% in the next five years.

If GST has peaked to Rs 1.40 lakh crore, it is because of inflation and not because of high buoyancy in production and productivity of the industry. Industry is struggling to stay afloat

Doing Business will be Difficult

To establish a globally competitive business environment for certain domestic companies, a concessional tax regime of 15% was introduced by the government for newly incorporated domestic manufacturing companies. The FM extended the last date for commencement of manufacturing or production under section 115BAB by one year, ie, from March 31, 2023, to March 31, 2024.

The ‘One Station One Product’ concept is laudable as a souvenir shop will help generate business and spread awareness about local art and craft.

Although the Budget 2022-23 proposes several initiatives for ‘Ease of Doing Business’, including modernisation of building byelaws, Unique Land Parcel Identification Number for IT-based management of land records, Accelerated Corporate Exit and introduction of new ‘Updated return’ — a provision to file an Updated Return on payment of additional tax, the cost of doing business is bound to go up and this will dampen the initiative.

The country needs judicial reforms and several regulatory reforms to make us highly competitive. The Budget was silent on these. The issue of high Customs duties and non-tariff barriers on basic raw material, other than steel, such as copper, aluminum, and polymers also remain largely unaddressed.

Poor, earning less than $1.90 a day as per purchasing power parity of 2011, have nothing to cheer. The Union government seems to be for the rich, of the rich, and by the rich. While rich by itself is no evil as everyone would like to be one, the road to such reach should be laid by governments. Some old tools, like more investment through PPP and disinvestment, to ensure a level playing field have been dusted off to provide the companies some cheer. The Budget is deceptive in approach and has less prospects of success.

(The author is an Economist and Risk Management Specialist)

Bluster Budget (telanganatoday.com)

Wednesday, February 5, 2020

Hopes, Aspirations and Disappointments - Union Budget 2020


Hope, Aspirations and Disappointments

Nirmala Sitaraman starts on Aspirational Note. The two hour forty minute long budget speech creating record could perhaps prove the dictum: ‘if you fail in logic resort to rhetoric.’ Let me deal with the hopes and aspirations first and then with the disappointments later.

It has for first time addressed the farm sector comprehensively providing end-to-end solutions but leaves no assurance for income in the hands of the farmer. Allied activities get a boost. If a farmer were to hold a few animals in the backyard, a fishpond and a small poultry in addition to crop farming or horticulture, he has everything in the budget to cheer. There is every chance to cross-hold risks among the farming and allied activities.

States should follow the intent and modify the Agricultural Marketing laws to make way for the responsible aggregators and technology. Warehousing facilities in the Agriculture Market Yards and cold storage facilities would insulate the farmer from fluctuations in returns to the farm produce.
FM has announced Rs.15lakh farm credit amidst unwelcoming banker in the rural areas and banks that have learnt the art of showing up in figures that they do not deliver to the intended customers. It is heartening to see the push for Primary Agricultural Credit Societies that were almost forgotten for decades. NABARD that has half of its fleet serving Mumbai Headquarters should have been restructured for focused attention on farm credit. She should have forsaken tolerance for not achieving priority sector targets to take the RIDF window. This is a lost opportunity.

While the erstwhile lost focus on Education, Health and Hygiene has been regained with appropriate budget allocations and set a new direction through internships in higher education, unless infrastructure for primary education and teaching skills are enhanced the foundations will remain weak. Introducing internships in higher education has potential to make education fit the employment bill. We may hope for a correction through the National Education Policy the Government is planning to introduce.

The District Teaching Hospitals and para medical services planned will sow the seeds for sustainable health interventions. This just marks only a good beginning as the effect can be felt only after five years.

With the measly allocation for MNREGS and not linking it to the farm sector the budget left a void. It failed to kindle the appetite for consumption, the trigger for growth. The consumer is not left with much surpluses either for increased investment or consumption. Growth impulses are not generated significantly.

MSME sector has got a new direction with the introduction of sub-ordinated debt or equity funding but it remains to be seen whether the Banks that failed them in credit would meet the new equity route and help scaling up process. TReDs and GEMs are not new interventions to talk of. Unless all the government departments and PSUs enroll on these platforms, MSM|E vendors would not get their due. For those moving to organized way of doing business with just 5% in cash are exempt from audit up to Rs.5cr turnover.

In the last budget, the FM made a reference to U.K. Sinha Committee Report, but she skipped it now. Neither Distressed Asset Fund to ensure that no viable manufacturing MSME downs its shutters, nor Fund of Funds found allocation in the Budget. In a slowdown, it makes lot of sense to ensure that no viable manufacturing MSME exits so that the workforce engaged therein would not add to the unemployed. 

Economic Survey 2020 made a very detailed analysis of the banking in the financial sector. FM did not seem much worried over the increase in frauds and poor credit risk of the Banks. Although it is heartening to see that no further capital allocation is made cutting into taxpayer’s purse, it is disappointing to see the absence of reforms in this sector. It would have been most appropriate to reduce the Government equity in these banks and usher in better governance than now. Bad banking and good economy are not good companions.

Banks irrespective of their size, in the current status will pull down the growth of the economy. The only solace is to the depositor whose Rs.5lacs is insured instead of just a lakh of rupees thus far. NBFCs are empowered to recover their bad debts through the SARFAESI Act provisions on par with Banks.

Extraordinary push to the digital economy with District Cyber Parks, AI, MML and ITES in addition to Travel and Tourism is likely to enhance the contribution of the Services sector. Start up, Stand Up India and Make in India have not thus far led to increase in the contribution of manufacturing sector and this budget also did not make significant strides to reverse the negative growth. Telangana State seemed to have provided inspiration on this count.

Agriculture sector alone may not reverse the slow growth of the economy. Employment intensity has little scope to increase. Unless 20% credit -GDP ratio is attained with better risk appetite among banks, recovery from slow growth is doubtful.

If both the government and private entities depend on market for raising the resources as indicated in the Budget, revised estimates of the budgeted revenues and expenditure fall short of growth expectations. The Budget failed to institute a monitoring mechanism for implementation of the ambitious projects. States should be taken into confidence while formulating the Budget as it is the States that should catch up and cooperate for the aspirational goals and ambitious announcements to turn into actions.

Intention of the FM to keep more money in the hands of the people did not result in compatible actions. Overall on a ten-point scale the Budget scores a liberal six, more due to comprehensive treatment to the farm sector than other sectors.

Published in Telangana Today 5th February 2020.




Sunday, July 28, 2019

Concept Banking


Concept Banking

The year was 1972. State Bank of India, under the Chairmanship of R.K. Talwar pioneered the concept banking with the opening of five Agricultural Development Branches (ADB)in the entire country on a single day. He chose the first set of ‘Agents’ (later changed to Branch Manager). Significantly, three of them were in Andhra Pradesh. I was asked to arrange for the inauguration by the District Collector as the first incumbent of Visakhaptnam ADB. The date was set by the Central Office. District Collector S.N. Achanta inaugurated in the presence of Regional Manager, Development Manager, Area Superintendent (Bank has divided each region into compact areas to give guidance to the managers and oversee the development lending that had social objective and also effectively liaise with the district administration).

Government of India by then established Small Farmers Development Agency (SFDA) and Marginal Farmers and Agricultural Labourers’ Development Agency (MFALDA). (Both were subsumed in Integrated Rural Development Program subsequently).Each of them had a Project Director – either a junior IAS officer or an experienced Block Development Officer as Project Director.

Though Bank was lending for Agriculture from the day of Nationalization of Banks, concept banking involved special attention to the target clientele under village adoption (VA) approach and Group Guarantee scheme (GGS) to cover the unsecured marginal farmers and agricultural labourers. Both village adoption and group guarantee were innovations at that point, of the SBI. Bank recruited agricultural graduates as Rural Development Officers to serve the extension requirements of credit and this proved a boon to farmers. Of course, Syndicate Bank pioneered in lending for rural development with extension and others followed with their own incremental innovations.

Bank strongly believed that credit risk can be managed adequately and appropriately only when its field staff and managers knew the area, the activity and the person behind the activity well. It is with this perspective that an elaborate 8page schedule was prepared for VA. Data requirements demanded both secondary data and primary data. Types of soils, area under cultivation under different crops and different streams of irrigation, bovine population, flora and fauna, demographics, number of holdings in the fold of small and marginal, details of opinion leaders etc., constituted the major components of the schedule. Bank held one-day workshops on the manner of filling up the schedules at its Staff Training Centers.

Branch Management that too of a concept branch, whose functioning was under review by the top management, was the most enticing challenge faced by me. It involved careful planning, effective public relations, responsible business operations, handing limited human resources, and above all proximity to the farmers, the live wire of our economy. Head Office posted one accountant and one field officer, with a promise to post two more field officers in a month.

Visakhaptnam was MFALDA district. Project Director Alla Pitchaiah disclosed that the Agency identified 500 agricultural labourers engaged in pineapple and cashew cultivation on the hill slopes and 5000 marginal farmers for crop cultivation in Bhimunipatnam and Pendurthi blocks. He expected that the ADB should take the leadership in lending.
Day used to start at 5a.m., when I used to pick up the field officer on the way to village after village for their adoption by the branch to deliver credit that was scarce and out of tune with farmer’s requirements. Collecting data about the village helped due diligence of the farmers later. Farmers knew what they do with their land, animals and tools. They were a beehive of knowledge in so far as agriculture is concerned. They taught me agriculture.

Bank gave a soil test kit with a manual of its usage. This helped me build close relationship with farmers as I used to test the soil and tell the farmer how much and what fertiliser should be applied. It was here I learnt the meaning and shape of udder of a milch animal; how important it is to take care of the calf to ensure yield to the optimum. It was the poultry farmer who taught me the way to weed out a sick bird from the flock to protect the asset. Knowledge of activity, knowledge of area and knowledge of person are three essential competencies of a good credit analyst. Apart from the ICAR-published Handbook on Agriculture and Animal Husbandry that provided academic inputs, farmer interaction helped me become a practical banker.

Since this was concept banking, press and media were after me to flash stories of how the bank was helping the farmers. One day, the UNI correspondent, Hanumantha Rao asked me whether he could accompany us (I and my 2 field officers) to a village, Pandrangipuram, 6km from Tagarapuvalasa (Bhimunipatnam Block) where I programmed on-site documentation for disbursing crop loans. Application for crop loan and loan document were each of four and nine pages. Each page required a signature of the borrower and guarantor and if it is thumb impression for an illiterate farmer, a signature of the witness at the end of each page. The process started at 7am and by lunch time about 30 of the 50 targeted farmers could be completed. At about 3pm he took leave of us. We did it for the 30 adopted villages in the two blocks.

Next morning, as I was having my morning meal, the Development Manager (Ag) and Regional Manager gave two separate calls almost asking my explanation for the news item that appeared in all the English and Vernacular dailies (those days, newspapers in Visakhapatnam used to be delivered post-noon and therefore I had no knowledge of what appeared). I told them that I did not issue any press statement, but the Correspondent picked up the story as he witnessed the onsite loan documentation. The news item mentioned: “Even for Rs.100 loan, 410 signatures are required. The Agent, State Bank of India ADB confirmed.” This was a box item that appeared underneath a photograph of the inauguration of State Bank Staff College by Y.B. Chavan, FM, with R.K. Talwar, Chairman. No wonder, it sparked lot of controversy. But the issue had to be handled. Regional Manager asked me to take the morning flight and reach directly State Bank Staff College, Begumpet for a meeting with the Chairman pre-lunch.

Girding up my loins, I left for Hyderabad. In the meantime, Chairman asked the Development Manager (Ag) whether it was true that the document required so many signatures. He counted physically and confirmed that the number mentioned in the news item marginally fell short. I went to the Staff College Visitors’ lounge and saw the RM and DM waiting. They took me to the Chairman. He asked me to join lunch.

After a few fondly enquiries about the branch, the number of villages adopted and the way of identification of borrower-farmers and the number of farmers covered by the branch flor lending etc., as also of my father and family, he asked me for a solution to the problem. My response was: when the law of the land was equal to all banks, why our bank should have a 9-page loan document compared to a 4-page document of Canara Bank. I have also told him that per day I was able to cover only 50 farmers with such elaborate application and documentation and I would not have the luxury of covering 2000 farmers before the onset of monsoon, he directed the RM to immediately post three more field officers and desired that the lending must be over before commencement of the crop season. Those days, cash and kind component were to be delivered separately.

Then, he asked the Chief Manager Agriculture, SBI Central Office to constitute a working group with me, DM (Agri) as members and phoned up to Chitale & Co, legal advisers of SBI to join the team. The task was to simplify the application form and prepare a simpler loan document for release of all loans to farmers, ahead of the season.

The initial tremors caused by the box item almost damaging the reputation of SBI, resulted in simplification of procedures for loan disbursements. Every Loan sanctioned had to be reported to the Controlling Authority. I devised a Control form containing the required details in a single sheet, the size of which was 15”x20” incorporating twenty sanctions in a sheet.

The branch during the first year established a record of lending 2000 farmers for crop loans and 50 farmers for term lending to various activities like construction of dug wells with motor and pump set, diary, and 100 agricultural labourers for pineapple cultivation on the hill slopes of Simhachalam. This Pineapple variety was a juicy variety and I realised that they needed marketing support as the local sale was only for table variety. Liaising with MFALDA Kolkata market was connected for bulk sale.

The recovery season started, and every jealous eye was watching us. Believe me, it was repayment and not recovery as I assured during the awareness camps for recovery that they would get next crop loan if they repaid on time both interest and principal. At least 10 percent pledged their jewellery and repaid the crop loans while the rest sold their crops and repaid. Agricultural Cash Credit at the beginning of next season had no non-performing loan with ‘nil’ balance., Cash credit

We had night halts in the villages and used to attend the marriages of the children of farmer-borrowers as also opinion leaders with a gift from the branch to the couple. There used to be quite a bit of socialization with the farmers and the reason: credit flowed with extension and advice in time.

Concept banking moved much latter to small industries. At the behest of GoI, banks set up SME branches. Bank after liberalization gradually diluted this type of concept banking and flow of credit with extension.
*This is part of my autobiography.

Saturday, February 3, 2018

Tepid Union Budget 2018

This budget has an increment of Rs.11000cr over the previous outlay. But the direction has changed more to the health and education sectors. The effect of these interventions will be experienced more in future than immediate present. 

In so far as Agriculture is concerned the farmers get some announcements and hopefully, appropriate rules will be made to ensure that the farmers get 1.5 times the cost price for their produce. So far they have not been able to get the dividend out of the MSP. E-Nam spread though welcome has not so far stabilised in delivering the intended benefits to the farmers. 

A non-budget allocation of Rs.11lakh crores to farm credit is again a please all announcement. If NITi Aayog comes up with a modicum of lending to the tenant farmers with the owners' interests duly protected, things may change in the short term credit. Any short term credit not matched with the term lending or investment credit for farm sector as has happened so far, would end up in only irresponsible target chase. 

Agriculture should have been provided a separate budget because of the low growth experienced (just around 2.1%) and the already admitted climate change risks in the Economic Survey 2018. 

In so far as MSMEs are concerned, emphasis on the food processing, leather and apparels would provide great fillip. National Bamboo Mission would provide the bamboo based artisans and small enterprises in rural areas and tribal areas a great opportunity for developing branding and move to export zone. 

MSEs' major problem is availability of land for setting up the enterprise as the land prices everywhere are just soaring to unbearable heights. If he had announced tax exemption for five years for infrastructure and land cost in Rural Industrial Parks - either private or state - it would have been of great help.

In the name of MSME sector, the corporate tax exemption threshold rise to Rs.250 crores would help the medium enterprises and mid-corporates that constitute less than 2% of the total number of MSMEs. This is more an apology of support to the sector.

Mudra Loans target increase by 3lakhs should have been more specific to manufacturing MSEs. So far less than 3% of the total loans have been given to manufacturing. 

SHG credit allocation of Rs.75000 cr - a non-budget allocation would be rebalancing the gender portfolio of banks in the MSME sector.


As a senior citizen I am happy that my medical bill is better met now than before. The FM deserves thanks for this concern.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

How to redefine and rebuild the banks in India

How to redefine and rebuild Banks?

‘Banks are basically meant to allocate capital to businesses and consumers efficiently.’ Post demonetization, customers feel the pain more than gain in banks. Farmers getting inadequate and untimely credit from banks take to huge private debt only to commit suicides later.

Manufacturing micro and small enterprises, the seed beds of employment and entrepreneurship, are being shown the door by the banks notwithstanding the CGTMSE guarantee up to Rs.2crore. Banks never went beyond the mandated Rs.10lakh guarantee cover for the MSEs.

Large number of customers is slapped with irrational minimum balances in their accounts and levy of penalties at will. RBI is averse to regulate such overtures in the name of micro management of banks being not their role.

With over 38% of the population still illiterate, Jan Dhan and Mudra Yojana as instruments of financial inclusion have only become compulsive agenda for the banking sector. Banks- Public sector or private sector, have their eyes set only on profit. Such profits are dwindling with net interest margins declining following the growing NPAs.

Institutional innovations like the Small Payment Banks, India Post and the likes as also the MFIs have also proved inadequate to meet the needs of the present leave alone the future banking needs of the population.

Cashless banking leading to poor inflow of deposits during the last four months and cashless ATMs demonstrate the erosion of faith in banking in India. Bad banking and good economy cannot co-exist and therefore, it is imperative that innovative institutional solutions should be thought of.

Indian economy targeting double digit growth ere long has competing clientele bases in the current milieu of banking. Domain banking has moved to high tech banking. Men at counters have now become slaves of the machine instead of being masters. Public sector banks have long back forgotten their purpose and their owner proving no better.

Emerging context requires that banking is redefined to meet the specificities of farming, employment, entrepreneurship, infrastructure, and international finance as distinct entities. In fact, Narasimham Committee (1991) suggested consolidation and convergence of the PSBs into six to serve the needs of the service sector, holding government securities, and retail lending; Local Area Banks to cater to the farmers and small entrepreneurs; International Bank to cater to the needs of exports and imports. Development Finance institutions, left untouched, would fund the infrastructure sector. FSLRC also echoed the same in its Report. This is the time to look at the spirit of such recommendations and rebuild the banks to regain the fast eroding trust in banking by the larger customer base of this country.

KISAN BANK:
Breaking the nexus between the farmer and politician can happen only when there is mutual trust between the bank and the farmer. Farm sector, consisting of crop farming (organic, precision, green technologies etc.), dairy farming, shrimp farming, poultry farming, sheep farming and agricultural marketing by itself is inherently capable of cross holding risks, save exceptions like the tsunamis, severe drought for long spells, huge typhoons. It is only in the event of such natural calamities that a Disaster Mitigation Fund should come to the rescue.

The existing commercial banks should shed this portfolio in favour of RRBs and merge all the rural branches with the RRBs. RRBs should be redesigned to take to farm lending in a big way – from farm machinery to crop farming and allied sectors on a project basis. Insurance plays a vital role in mitigating credit risk and therefore, the insurance products should be redesigned and modified on the lines of South Korean model.

All the Rural Cooperative Banks could continue their lending to the farm sector parallel to the RRBs as the lending requirements are huge and farmers require multiple but dedicated lending institutions.

RBI has not been comprehensive in regulating the sector. It is better that NABARD is restructured to play an exclusive refinance and regulatory role over the entire farm and rural lending consistent with its purpose of formation. Its other functions like the RIDF can be relegated to a new institution hived off from the NABARD.

UDYOG MITRA Bank

Nurturing entrepreneurship and promoting employment in manufacturing are moving at snail space in the Start Up, Stand Up and Make-in-India initiatives. Prabhat Kumar Committee (2017) called for setting up a National MSME Authority directly under the PMO to correct the milieu.

All the MSEs should be financed by dedicated MSE Bank Branches. All the existing SME branches should be brought under a new regulatory institution. SIDBI has disappointed the sector. It has to first consolidate all its FUNDS into just five: Incubation Fund; Venture Capital; Equity Fund to meet the margin requirements of MSEs when and where required; Marketing Fund to meet the market promotional requirements; Technology Fund; and Revival and Rehabilitation fund.

SIDBI should reshape into refinance and regulatory institution for the MSME sector with focus on manufacturing and manufacturing alone. It should divest its direct lending portfolio to avoid any conflict of interest. Its present lending to real estate and non-manufacturing MSME lending should be transferred to the commercial banks. RBI which is not currently able to cope with the regulatory burden of this sector can transfer it to SIDBI,

Vaanijya Banks (Commercial Bank):
All the existing commercial banks – both in the public and private sector – would do well confining to the project finance, lending to real estate, services sector, housing, exports and imports etc. All the Banks should constitute at the Board level a sub-committee on Development Banking to work on the transition arrangements to the above functionality.

Maulika Vitta Vitharana Samstha (Infrastructure Bank)
Huge NPAs have come from the practice of lending long with short term resource base coupled with lack of experience in assessing the risks in lending for infrastructure projects. ‘All the perfumes of Arabia’ (RBI’s structural debt restructuring solutions) did not sweeten the bloody hands of banks. It is time to revisit the universal banking model and reestablish Infrastructure Bank to fund the infrastructure projects and logistic parks.

These measures would help achieving the growth like never before.
RBI and GoI could constitute a High Level Committee to work on the modalities for transiting to the new structural transformation of the financial sector.

http://www.moneylife.in/article/how-to-redefine-and-rebuild-banks-for-emerging-demands/50376.html